¿When is there archive?
What defines the archive genre? Does the categorization respond exclusively to formal characteristics or can the archive also be thought of as a non-visible poetic of approach to certain themes? Which are these themes repeatedly addressed from archivist perspectives? Making a corpus of analysis to a...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Producción e Investigación en Artes, Facultad de Artes, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/30028 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | What defines the archive genre? Does the categorization respond exclusively to formal characteristics or can the archive also be thought of as a non-visible poetic of approach to certain themes? Which are these themes repeatedly addressed from archivist perspectives? Making a corpus of analysis to answer these questions led us to ask what effect art discourses have on the categorization of experiences in certain formats.
This attempts against phenomenological theoretical positions: instead of asking what is archive, we ask when this poetic exists. Such situated analysis seeks, first of all, to discover the political interference of aesthetic experiences that recover particular situations in order to insert them into exhibition circuits, and secondly, what implies that these circuits are linked to certain themes by archiving them. |
|---|