In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock

In this paper I will try to relate the criticism of Hal Foster to the implications of shock –or of the aesthetics of shock, as I understand it– that Peter Bürger maintains in the Theory of the avant-garde (1974), with certain notions that the German author outlines in his article "The aesthetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Yovino, Enzo Nicolás
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Producción e Investigación en Artes, Facultad de Artes, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319
Aporte de:
id I10-R361-article-25319
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R361-article-253192023-03-02T18:54:45Z In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock In a long time. Notas sobre la reconstrucción dialógica del shock vanguardista Yovino, Enzo Nicolás aesthetic truth deferred action communicative action dialogue avant-garde verdad estética acción diferida acción comunicativa diálogo vanguardia In this paper I will try to relate the criticism of Hal Foster to the implications of shock –or of the aesthetics of shock, as I understand it– that Peter Bürger maintains in the Theory of the avant-garde (1974), with certain notions that the German author outlines in his article "The aesthetic truth" (1988). I will explain how a part of the objections that Foster presents are answered in that article and this will lead us to a point of convergence between both authors, who borrow conceptual tools from psychoanalysis. However, as I will show, such convergence can also be understood in pragmatic-communicative terms. En este trabajo intentaré poner en relación la crítica de Hal Foster a las implicaciones del shock –o de la estética del shock, como yo lo entiendo– que Peter Bürger sostiene en la Teoría de la vanguardia (1974), con ciertas nociones que el autor alemán esboza en su artículo “La verdad estética” (1988). Voy a exponer cómo una parte de las objeciones que Foster presenta están contestadas en ese artículo y esto nos llevará a un punto de convergencia entre ambos autores, que toman prestadas herramientas conceptuales del psicoanálisis. No obstante, como mostraré, tal convergencia puede entenderse también en términos pragmático-comunicativos. Centro de Producción e Investigación en Artes, Facultad de Artes, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. 2019-09-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Double-blind peer-reviewed article Artículo revisado por sistema de pares doble ciego application/pdf text/html application/epub+zip https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319 10.55443/artilugio.n5.2019.25319 Artilugio; No. 5 (2019): Temporality, Context and Imaginary Frameworks; 76-87 Artilugio; Núm. 5 (2019): Temporalidad, contexto y entramados imaginarios; 76-87 Artilugio; n. 5 (2019): Temporalidad, contexto y entramados imaginarios; 76-87 2408-462X 10.55443/artilugio.n5.2019 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319/24593 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319/24612 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319/24640 Derechos de autor 2019 Enzo Nicolás Yovino http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-361
container_title_str Artilugio
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic aesthetic truth
deferred action
communicative action
dialogue
avant-garde
verdad estética
acción diferida
acción comunicativa
diálogo
vanguardia
spellingShingle aesthetic truth
deferred action
communicative action
dialogue
avant-garde
verdad estética
acción diferida
acción comunicativa
diálogo
vanguardia
Yovino, Enzo Nicolás
In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock
topic_facet aesthetic truth
deferred action
communicative action
dialogue
avant-garde
verdad estética
acción diferida
acción comunicativa
diálogo
vanguardia
author Yovino, Enzo Nicolás
author_facet Yovino, Enzo Nicolás
author_sort Yovino, Enzo Nicolás
title In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock
title_short In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock
title_full In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock
title_fullStr In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock
title_full_unstemmed In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock
title_sort in a long time. notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock
description In this paper I will try to relate the criticism of Hal Foster to the implications of shock –or of the aesthetics of shock, as I understand it– that Peter Bürger maintains in the Theory of the avant-garde (1974), with certain notions that the German author outlines in his article "The aesthetic truth" (1988). I will explain how a part of the objections that Foster presents are answered in that article and this will lead us to a point of convergence between both authors, who borrow conceptual tools from psychoanalysis. However, as I will show, such convergence can also be understood in pragmatic-communicative terms.
publisher Centro de Producción e Investigación en Artes, Facultad de Artes, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
publishDate 2019
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319
work_keys_str_mv AT yovinoenzonicolas inalongtimenotesonthedialogicalreconstructionoftheavantgardeshock
AT yovinoenzonicolas inalongtimenotassobrelareconstrucciondialogicadelshockvanguardista
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:28:01Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:28:01Z
_version_ 1809215632978214912