In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock
In this paper I will try to relate the criticism of Hal Foster to the implications of shock –or of the aesthetics of shock, as I understand it– that Peter Bürger maintains in the Theory of the avant-garde (1974), with certain notions that the German author outlines in his article "The aesthetic...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo revista |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
Centro de Producción e Investigación en Artes, Facultad de Artes, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I10-R361-article-25319 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
I10-R361-article-253192023-03-02T18:54:45Z In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock In a long time. Notas sobre la reconstrucción dialógica del shock vanguardista Yovino, Enzo Nicolás aesthetic truth deferred action communicative action dialogue avant-garde verdad estética acción diferida acción comunicativa diálogo vanguardia In this paper I will try to relate the criticism of Hal Foster to the implications of shock –or of the aesthetics of shock, as I understand it– that Peter Bürger maintains in the Theory of the avant-garde (1974), with certain notions that the German author outlines in his article "The aesthetic truth" (1988). I will explain how a part of the objections that Foster presents are answered in that article and this will lead us to a point of convergence between both authors, who borrow conceptual tools from psychoanalysis. However, as I will show, such convergence can also be understood in pragmatic-communicative terms. En este trabajo intentaré poner en relación la crítica de Hal Foster a las implicaciones del shock –o de la estética del shock, como yo lo entiendo– que Peter Bürger sostiene en la Teoría de la vanguardia (1974), con ciertas nociones que el autor alemán esboza en su artículo “La verdad estética” (1988). Voy a exponer cómo una parte de las objeciones que Foster presenta están contestadas en ese artículo y esto nos llevará a un punto de convergencia entre ambos autores, que toman prestadas herramientas conceptuales del psicoanálisis. No obstante, como mostraré, tal convergencia puede entenderse también en términos pragmático-comunicativos. Centro de Producción e Investigación en Artes, Facultad de Artes, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. 2019-09-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Double-blind peer-reviewed article Artículo revisado por sistema de pares doble ciego application/pdf text/html application/epub+zip https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319 10.55443/artilugio.n5.2019.25319 Artilugio; No. 5 (2019): Temporality, Context and Imaginary Frameworks; 76-87 Artilugio; Núm. 5 (2019): Temporalidad, contexto y entramados imaginarios; 76-87 Artilugio; n. 5 (2019): Temporalidad, contexto y entramados imaginarios; 76-87 2408-462X 10.55443/artilugio.n5.2019 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319/24593 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319/24612 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319/24640 Derechos de autor 2019 Enzo Nicolás Yovino http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
institution_str |
I-10 |
repository_str |
R-361 |
container_title_str |
Artilugio |
language |
Español |
format |
Artículo revista |
topic |
aesthetic truth deferred action communicative action dialogue avant-garde verdad estética acción diferida acción comunicativa diálogo vanguardia |
spellingShingle |
aesthetic truth deferred action communicative action dialogue avant-garde verdad estética acción diferida acción comunicativa diálogo vanguardia Yovino, Enzo Nicolás In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock |
topic_facet |
aesthetic truth deferred action communicative action dialogue avant-garde verdad estética acción diferida acción comunicativa diálogo vanguardia |
author |
Yovino, Enzo Nicolás |
author_facet |
Yovino, Enzo Nicolás |
author_sort |
Yovino, Enzo Nicolás |
title |
In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock |
title_short |
In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock |
title_full |
In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock |
title_fullStr |
In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock |
title_full_unstemmed |
In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock |
title_sort |
in a long time. notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock |
description |
In this paper I will try to relate the criticism of Hal Foster to the implications of shock –or of the aesthetics of shock, as I understand it– that Peter Bürger maintains in the Theory of the avant-garde (1974), with certain notions that the German author outlines in his article "The aesthetic truth" (1988). I will explain how a part of the objections that Foster presents are answered in that article and this will lead us to a point of convergence between both authors, who borrow conceptual tools from psychoanalysis. However, as I will show, such convergence can also be understood in pragmatic-communicative terms. |
publisher |
Centro de Producción e Investigación en Artes, Facultad de Artes, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yovinoenzonicolas inalongtimenotesonthedialogicalreconstructionoftheavantgardeshock AT yovinoenzonicolas inalongtimenotassobrelareconstrucciondialogicadelshockvanguardista |
first_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:28:01Z |
last_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:28:01Z |
_version_ |
1809215632978214912 |