Methods for group decisions: comparison between drv and smaa processes

The paper compares two methods developed to aid group decision making. They are the DRV Processes and SMAA methods. It contains synthetic descriptions of both methods. An example allows the quantitative comparison. Similarity and differences are identified between both approach analyses. Finally con...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zanazzi, José L., Dimitroff, Magdalena, Pontelli, Daniel, Pedrotti, Beatriz
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Escuela de Perfeccionamiento en Investigación Operativa 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/epio/article/view/20304
Aporte de:
id I10-R359-article-20304
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R359-article-203042018-06-14T15:43:22Z Methods for group decisions: comparison between drv and smaa processes Métodos para tomar decisiones en grupo: comparación entre procesos drv y smaa Zanazzi, José L. Dimitroff, Magdalena Pontelli, Daniel Pedrotti, Beatriz group decision making DRV processes stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis tomar decisiones en equipo procesos de DRV análisis estocástico de aceptabilidad multicriterio The paper compares two methods developed to aid group decision making. They are the DRV Processes and SMAA methods. It contains synthetic descriptions of both methods. An example allows the quantitative comparison. Similarity and differences are identified between both approach analyses. Finally concludes with the argument that both proposals are different due to small differences in the problems they intend to solve. El presente artículo compara dos métodos desarrollados para la toma de decisiones en equipo: los procesos DRV y los métodos SMAA. Este trabajo presenta una descripción sintética de ambos métodos y exhibe un ejemplo real que permite la comparación de ambas técnicas. Se identifican similitudes y diferencias entre ambos enfoques. Finalmente se concluye observando que ambas propuestas son diferentes debido a pequeñas diferencias en los problemas que pretenden resolver. Escuela de Perfeccionamiento en Investigación Operativa 2018-06-14 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/epio/article/view/20304 Revista de la Escuela de Perfeccionamiento en Investigación Operativa; Vol. 21 Núm. 34 (2013): Noviembre; 45-61 1853-9777 0329-7322 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/epio/article/view/20304/19949
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-359
container_title_str Revista de la Escuela de Perfeccionamiento en Investigación Operativa
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic group decision making
DRV processes
stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis
tomar decisiones en equipo
procesos de DRV
análisis estocástico de aceptabilidad multicriterio
spellingShingle group decision making
DRV processes
stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis
tomar decisiones en equipo
procesos de DRV
análisis estocástico de aceptabilidad multicriterio
Zanazzi, José L.
Dimitroff, Magdalena
Pontelli, Daniel
Pedrotti, Beatriz
Methods for group decisions: comparison between drv and smaa processes
topic_facet group decision making
DRV processes
stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis
tomar decisiones en equipo
procesos de DRV
análisis estocástico de aceptabilidad multicriterio
author Zanazzi, José L.
Dimitroff, Magdalena
Pontelli, Daniel
Pedrotti, Beatriz
author_facet Zanazzi, José L.
Dimitroff, Magdalena
Pontelli, Daniel
Pedrotti, Beatriz
author_sort Zanazzi, José L.
title Methods for group decisions: comparison between drv and smaa processes
title_short Methods for group decisions: comparison between drv and smaa processes
title_full Methods for group decisions: comparison between drv and smaa processes
title_fullStr Methods for group decisions: comparison between drv and smaa processes
title_full_unstemmed Methods for group decisions: comparison between drv and smaa processes
title_sort methods for group decisions: comparison between drv and smaa processes
description The paper compares two methods developed to aid group decision making. They are the DRV Processes and SMAA methods. It contains synthetic descriptions of both methods. An example allows the quantitative comparison. Similarity and differences are identified between both approach analyses. Finally concludes with the argument that both proposals are different due to small differences in the problems they intend to solve.
publisher Escuela de Perfeccionamiento en Investigación Operativa
publishDate 2018
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/epio/article/view/20304
work_keys_str_mv AT zanazzijosel methodsforgroupdecisionscomparisonbetweendrvandsmaaprocesses
AT dimitroffmagdalena methodsforgroupdecisionscomparisonbetweendrvandsmaaprocesses
AT pontellidaniel methodsforgroupdecisionscomparisonbetweendrvandsmaaprocesses
AT pedrottibeatriz methodsforgroupdecisionscomparisonbetweendrvandsmaaprocesses
AT zanazzijosel metodosparatomardecisionesengrupocomparacionentreprocesosdrvysmaa
AT dimitroffmagdalena metodosparatomardecisionesengrupocomparacionentreprocesosdrvysmaa
AT pontellidaniel metodosparatomardecisionesengrupocomparacionentreprocesosdrvysmaa
AT pedrottibeatriz metodosparatomardecisionesengrupocomparacionentreprocesosdrvysmaa
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:23:14Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:23:14Z
_version_ 1809215331415097344