DEBATES ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE: STRATEGIC ARGUMENTS, TRIVIALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRATIC EROSION
The article analyzes a reform proposal to the Supreme Court of Justice approved by the Senate. To do this, it reviews the main attempts to modify the integration of the Court in the history of our country. The criterion used to carry out this analysis is that the reforms were successful. That is, th...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/43111 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R353-article-43111 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R353-article-431112024-07-02T18:40:52Z DEBATES ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE: STRATEGIC ARGUMENTS, TRIVIALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRATIC EROSION DISCUSIONES EN TORNO A LA COMPOSICIÓN DE LA CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA DE LA NACIÓN: ARGUMENTOS ESTRATÉGICOS, BANALIZACIÓN DE LAS INSTITUCIONES Y EROSIÓN DEMOCRÁTICA Mocoroa, Juan M. Supreme Court Institutional system Judicial Independence Corte Suprema Sistema Institucional Independencia judicial The article analyzes a reform proposal to the Supreme Court of Justice approved by the Senate. To do this, it reviews the main attempts to modify the integration of the Court in the history of our country. The criterion used to carry out this analysis is that the reforms were successful. That is, that the composition of the Court was effectively altered. With this scenario in mind, the work describes and criticizes the arguments that were used to approve the aforementioned project in the National Senate. Finally, the text concludes that these arguments are strategic, rather than institutional with a view to the better functioning of the Court. El artículo analiza una propuesta de reforma a la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación aprobada por el Senado. Para hacer eso, pasa revista a los principales intentos de modificación a la integración del Tribunal en la historia de nuestro país. El criterio que se utiliza para hacer ese análisis es que las reformas sean exitosas. Esto es, que la composición de la Corte efectivamente fue alterada. Con este escenario en mente, el trabajo describe y critica los argumentos que se utilizaron para aprobar el referido proyecto en el Senado de la Nación. Finalmente, el texto concluye que esos argumentos son estratégicos, antes que institucionales con miras en el mejor funcionamiento de la Corte. Facultad de Derecho 2023-11-15 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/43111 10.31054/2314.3061.v14.n1.43111 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2023): NUEVA SERIE II; 251-270 2314-3061 1850-9371 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/43111/43077 Derechos de autor 2023 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-353 |
| container_title_str |
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Supreme Court Institutional system Judicial Independence Corte Suprema Sistema Institucional Independencia judicial |
| spellingShingle |
Supreme Court Institutional system Judicial Independence Corte Suprema Sistema Institucional Independencia judicial Mocoroa, Juan M. DEBATES ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE: STRATEGIC ARGUMENTS, TRIVIALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRATIC EROSION |
| topic_facet |
Supreme Court Institutional system Judicial Independence Corte Suprema Sistema Institucional Independencia judicial |
| author |
Mocoroa, Juan M. |
| author_facet |
Mocoroa, Juan M. |
| author_sort |
Mocoroa, Juan M. |
| title |
DEBATES ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE: STRATEGIC ARGUMENTS, TRIVIALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRATIC EROSION |
| title_short |
DEBATES ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE: STRATEGIC ARGUMENTS, TRIVIALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRATIC EROSION |
| title_full |
DEBATES ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE: STRATEGIC ARGUMENTS, TRIVIALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRATIC EROSION |
| title_fullStr |
DEBATES ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE: STRATEGIC ARGUMENTS, TRIVIALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRATIC EROSION |
| title_full_unstemmed |
DEBATES ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE: STRATEGIC ARGUMENTS, TRIVIALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRATIC EROSION |
| title_sort |
debates on the composition of the supreme court of justice: strategic arguments, trivialization of institutions and democratic erosion |
| description |
The article analyzes a reform proposal to the Supreme Court of Justice approved by the Senate. To do this, it reviews the main attempts to modify the integration of the Court in the history of our country. The criterion used to carry out this analysis is that the reforms were successful. That is, that the composition of the Court was effectively altered. With this scenario in mind, the work describes and criticizes the arguments that were used to approve the aforementioned project in the National Senate. Finally, the text concludes that these arguments are strategic, rather than institutional with a view to the better functioning of the Court. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Derecho |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/43111 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT mocoroajuanm debatesonthecompositionofthesupremecourtofjusticestrategicargumentstrivializationofinstitutionsanddemocraticerosion AT mocoroajuanm discusionesentornoalacomposiciondelacortesupremadejusticiadelanacionargumentosestrategicosbanalizaciondelasinstitucionesyerosiondemocratica |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:19:10Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:19:10Z |
| _version_ |
1809215075309846528 |