Contributions to Thinking About Interspecies Urbanism

The concept and design of urban spaces following the standard of hegemonic individuals is criticized by alternative lines of thought which conceive cities on the basis of human diversity. Such objections, however, disregard the fact that those individuals, as a primary distinctive feature, belong to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Perez Pejcic, Gonzalo
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2024
Materias:
urbanismo
capacitismo
especismo
ética animal
zoopolis
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/42396
Aporte de:
Astrolabio de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R348-article-42396
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-348
container_title_str Astrolabio
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic urbanismo
capacitismo
especismo
ética animal
zoopolis
spellingShingle urbanismo
capacitismo
especismo
ética animal
zoopolis
Perez Pejcic, Gonzalo
Contributions to Thinking About Interspecies Urbanism
topic_facet urbanismo
capacitismo
especismo
ética animal
zoopolis
author Perez Pejcic, Gonzalo
author_facet Perez Pejcic, Gonzalo
author_sort Perez Pejcic, Gonzalo
title Contributions to Thinking About Interspecies Urbanism
title_short Contributions to Thinking About Interspecies Urbanism
title_full Contributions to Thinking About Interspecies Urbanism
title_fullStr Contributions to Thinking About Interspecies Urbanism
title_full_unstemmed Contributions to Thinking About Interspecies Urbanism
title_sort contributions to thinking about interspecies urbanism
description The concept and design of urban spaces following the standard of hegemonic individuals is criticized by alternative lines of thought which conceive cities on the basis of human diversity. Such objections, however, disregard the fact that those individuals, as a primary distinctive feature, belong to the homo sapiens species, which has implications since the conception of territory and urban space is centered around those individuals. At the outset, this last aspect appears to be dilemmatic as we live among individuals forming part of different biological groups. Due to this fact, the aim of this essay is to analyse the concept of critical urban planning that takes a more intersectional and non-anthropocentric approach. I accordingly support the theories on disability which raise objections to the traditional urban planning framework based on city dwellers. I shall therefore critically consider the capacity-model reference, stating the anthropocentric reasons to reject the traditional way of thinking. I shall base my arguments on the reasons underlying the traditional framework, being speciesist in nature from the point of view of animal ethics, which actively interact with the notion of ableism based on a crip animal approach. Finally, I shall consider the political changes supporting the latest reflections related to animal rights, with a view to depicting their implications in the context of urban planning.
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad
publishDate 2024
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/42396
work_keys_str_mv AT perezpejcicgonzalo contributionstothinkingaboutinterspeciesurbanism
AT perezpejcicgonzalo aportesparapensarenurbanismosinterespecies
AT perezpejcicgonzalo contribuicoesparaareflexaosobreurbanismosinterespecies
first_indexed 2024-09-03T21:39:55Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T21:39:55Z
_version_ 1809212606500569088
spelling I10-R348-article-423962024-07-20T00:52:35Z Contributions to Thinking About Interspecies Urbanism Aportes para pensar en urbanismos interespecies Contribuições para a reflexão sobre urbanismos interespécies Perez Pejcic, Gonzalo urbanismo capacitismo especismo ética animal zoopolis The concept and design of urban spaces following the standard of hegemonic individuals is criticized by alternative lines of thought which conceive cities on the basis of human diversity. Such objections, however, disregard the fact that those individuals, as a primary distinctive feature, belong to the homo sapiens species, which has implications since the conception of territory and urban space is centered around those individuals. At the outset, this last aspect appears to be dilemmatic as we live among individuals forming part of different biological groups. Due to this fact, the aim of this essay is to analyse the concept of critical urban planning that takes a more intersectional and non-anthropocentric approach. I accordingly support the theories on disability which raise objections to the traditional urban planning framework based on city dwellers. I shall therefore critically consider the capacity-model reference, stating the anthropocentric reasons to reject the traditional way of thinking. I shall base my arguments on the reasons underlying the traditional framework, being speciesist in nature from the point of view of animal ethics, which actively interact with the notion of ableism based on a crip animal approach. Finally, I shall consider the political changes supporting the latest reflections related to animal rights, with a view to depicting their implications in the context of urban planning. Los espacios urbanos responden a un modelo de sujeto hegemónico que es criticado por distintas corrientes que abogan por ciudades pensadas desde la diversidad humana. Sin embargo, esas objeciones suelen llevarse a cabo sin cuestionar que el primer rasgo de aquel sujeto es su pertenencia a la especie homo sapiens y que, en consecuencia, la cuestión tanto territorial como de la urbe se centra en él. Esto es problemático, ya que convivimos con individuos de diferentes grupos biológicos. A raíz de ello, mi objetivo es plantear la necesidad de un urbanismo crítico, interseccional y no antropocéntrico. Con ese fin, selecciono los cuestionamientos que recibe el modelo tradicional de habitante urbano por parte de las teorías de la discapacidad. Me detendré en el carácter capacitista del prototipo de referencia y las razones antropocéntricas que se emplean para su rechazo. Luego, argumentaré que esos motivos son especistas desde la perspectiva de la ética animal e interactúan con el capacitismo a la luz del enfoque animalista crip. Por último, daré paso al giro político para los derechos de los animales con la intención de exhibir sus implicancias en materia de urbanismo. Os espaços urbanos respondem a um modelo de sujeito hegemônico que é criticado por diferentes correntes que defendem cidades concebidas com base na diversidade humana. No entanto, essas objeções podem ser feitas sem questionar o fato de que a primeira característica desse sujeito é que ele pertence à espécie homo sapiens e que, consequentemente, a questão territorial e urbana está centrada nele. Isso é problemático, pois convivemos com indivíduos de diferentes grupos biológicos. Como resultado, meu objetivo é levantar a necessidade de um urbanismo crítico, interseccional e não antropocêntrico. Para isso, seleciono as questões que o modelo tradicional do habitante urbano recebe das teorias sobre deficiência. Vou me concentrar no caráter facilitador do protótipo de referência e nas razões antropocêntricas para sua rejeição. Em seguida, argumentarei que essas razões são especistas a partir da ética animal e que elas interagem com o capacitismo à luz da abordagem crip animalista. Por fim, abordarei a virada política dos direitos dos animais com a intenção de mostrar suas implicações para o urbanismo. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2024-07-20 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículos revisados por pares application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/42396 10.55441/1668.7515.n33.42396 Astrolabio; No. 33 (2024): July - December: Towards the End of Human Exceptionality: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Animal Question; 78-105 Astrolabio; Núm. 33 (2024): Julio - Diciembre: Hacia el fin de la excepcionalidad humana: miradas multidisciplinarias sobre la cuestión animal; 78-105 Astrolabio; n. 33 (2024): Julho a dezembro: Rumo ao fim da excepcionalidade humana: perspectivas multidisciplinares sobre a questão animal; 78-105 1668-7515 10.55441/1668.7515.n33 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/42396/45738 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/42396/45801 Derechos de autor 2024 Gonzalo Perez Pejcic https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Ejemplares similares