Evaluation of different treatments of chronic and severe periodontitis in adult patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials

Chronic periodontitis is the most frequent type of periodontitis in the population. For its treatment, traditional mechanical methods are applied, such as scraping and root smoothing. Currently, the newest methods that apply antimicrobials, bactericides or lasers are used in combination with traditi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bono et al., Alejandra
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Facultad de Odontología 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/25252
Aporte de:
id I10-R335-article-25252
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R335-article-252522019-08-24T11:38:44Z Evaluation of different treatments of chronic and severe periodontitis in adult patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials Bono et al., Alejandra periodontitis meta-analysis treatment Chronic periodontitis is the most frequent type of periodontitis in the population. For its treatment, traditional mechanical methods are applied, such as scraping and root smoothing. Currently, the newest methods that apply antimicrobials, bactericides or lasers are used in combination with traditional methods. The results of clinical trial publications are contradictory about the best therapy to treat chronic periodontitis, so it is necessary to determine the evidence on this subject. The objective of this study was, therefore, to evaluate different treatments for chronic and severe periodontitis in adults through a meta-analysis of clinical trials. This study followed PRISMA guidelines to carry out the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trial studies and MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scielo Cochrane and Scopus databases, between July 30, 2016 and July 30, 2017. The meta-analysis was performed using the standardized mean difference (DME). Heterogeneity was tested using the Q test and the I2 statistic, using the meta-package - R 3.4.3 (2017). Measurements of insertion loss, depth of probing, bleeding rate and plaque index showed high heterogeneity, therefore the studies were grouped according to the type of treatment patients received (physical or bactericidal methods) for each variable, by what the heterogeneity of some variables decreased Facultad de Odontología 2019-08-24 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/25252 Revista de la Facultad de Odontología; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2019); 22-30 2545-7594 0325-1071 eng https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/25252/24498
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-335
container_title_str Revista de la Facultad de Odontología
language Inglés
format Artículo revista
topic periodontitis
meta-analysis
treatment
spellingShingle periodontitis
meta-analysis
treatment
Bono et al., Alejandra
Evaluation of different treatments of chronic and severe periodontitis in adult patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials
topic_facet periodontitis
meta-analysis
treatment
author Bono et al., Alejandra
author_facet Bono et al., Alejandra
author_sort Bono et al., Alejandra
title Evaluation of different treatments of chronic and severe periodontitis in adult patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_short Evaluation of different treatments of chronic and severe periodontitis in adult patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_full Evaluation of different treatments of chronic and severe periodontitis in adult patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_fullStr Evaluation of different treatments of chronic and severe periodontitis in adult patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different treatments of chronic and severe periodontitis in adult patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_sort evaluation of different treatments of chronic and severe periodontitis in adult patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials
description Chronic periodontitis is the most frequent type of periodontitis in the population. For its treatment, traditional mechanical methods are applied, such as scraping and root smoothing. Currently, the newest methods that apply antimicrobials, bactericides or lasers are used in combination with traditional methods. The results of clinical trial publications are contradictory about the best therapy to treat chronic periodontitis, so it is necessary to determine the evidence on this subject. The objective of this study was, therefore, to evaluate different treatments for chronic and severe periodontitis in adults through a meta-analysis of clinical trials. This study followed PRISMA guidelines to carry out the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trial studies and MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scielo Cochrane and Scopus databases, between July 30, 2016 and July 30, 2017. The meta-analysis was performed using the standardized mean difference (DME). Heterogeneity was tested using the Q test and the I2 statistic, using the meta-package - R 3.4.3 (2017). Measurements of insertion loss, depth of probing, bleeding rate and plaque index showed high heterogeneity, therefore the studies were grouped according to the type of treatment patients received (physical or bactericidal methods) for each variable, by what the heterogeneity of some variables decreased
publisher Facultad de Odontología
publishDate 2019
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/25252
work_keys_str_mv AT bonoetalalejandra evaluationofdifferenttreatmentsofchronicandsevereperiodontitisinadultpatientsmetaanalysisofclinicaltrials
first_indexed 2024-09-03T21:15:26Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T21:15:26Z
_version_ 1809211065958924288