Violence? In the Past Considerations on its Approach in Bioarchaeology

In this paper we discuss the legitimized ways of " making science " by the academy and, as part of this process, those frames of reference considered valid for inferences in archaeology and bioarchaeology. Based on bioarchaeological violence studies and the interpretations that result from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bettera Marcat, Gianina, Paladea Rojo, Ailem, Seldes, Veronica
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Estudios Históricos. UA CONICET 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/comechingonia/article/view/39948
Aporte de:
id I10-R319-article-39948
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-319
container_title_str Comechingonia. Revista de Arqueología
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Bioarchaeology
violence
ontological turn
reflexivity
Bioarqueología
violencia
giro ontológico
reflexividad
spellingShingle Bioarchaeology
violence
ontological turn
reflexivity
Bioarqueología
violencia
giro ontológico
reflexividad
Bettera Marcat, Gianina
Paladea Rojo, Ailem
Seldes, Veronica
Violence? In the Past Considerations on its Approach in Bioarchaeology
topic_facet Bioarchaeology
violence
ontological turn
reflexivity
Bioarqueología
violencia
giro ontológico
reflexividad
author Bettera Marcat, Gianina
Paladea Rojo, Ailem
Seldes, Veronica
author_facet Bettera Marcat, Gianina
Paladea Rojo, Ailem
Seldes, Veronica
author_sort Bettera Marcat, Gianina
title Violence? In the Past Considerations on its Approach in Bioarchaeology
title_short Violence? In the Past Considerations on its Approach in Bioarchaeology
title_full Violence? In the Past Considerations on its Approach in Bioarchaeology
title_fullStr Violence? In the Past Considerations on its Approach in Bioarchaeology
title_full_unstemmed Violence? In the Past Considerations on its Approach in Bioarchaeology
title_sort violence? in the past considerations on its approach in bioarchaeology
description In this paper we discuss the legitimized ways of " making science " by the academy and, as part of this process, those frames of reference considered valid for inferences in archaeology and bioarchaeology. Based on bioarchaeological violence studies and the interpretations that result from trauma analyses, we question the ways in which these indicators are named and referred to in research, as well as bioarchaeological indicators of conflict are described and quantified. In this sense, we propose the exercise of considering other ontologies of knowledge as theoretical alternatives for the inferences and interpretations of traumatic injuries. Thus, we consider the contributions of philosophical trends such as the ontological turn and the decolonial turn, decentring ourselves from the Western perspective proposed by modern science in order to apprehend the experiences of those who went through these events.
publisher Centro de Estudios Históricos. UA CONICET
publishDate 2023
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/comechingonia/article/view/39948
work_keys_str_mv AT betteramarcatgianina violenceinthepastconsiderationsonitsapproachinbioarchaeology
AT paladearojoailem violenceinthepastconsiderationsonitsapproachinbioarchaeology
AT seldesveronica violenceinthepastconsiderationsonitsapproachinbioarchaeology
AT betteramarcatgianina laviolenciaenelpasadoreflexionessobresuabordajeenbioarqueologia
AT paladearojoailem laviolenciaenelpasadoreflexionessobresuabordajeenbioarqueologia
AT seldesveronica laviolenciaenelpasadoreflexionessobresuabordajeenbioarqueologia
AT betteramarcatgianina violencianopassadoreflexoessobresuaabordagemnabioarqueologia
AT paladearojoailem violencianopassadoreflexoessobresuaabordagemnabioarqueologia
AT seldesveronica violencianopassadoreflexoessobresuaabordagemnabioarqueologia
first_indexed 2024-09-03T20:44:27Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T20:44:27Z
_version_ 1809209116481028096
spelling I10-R319-article-399482023-12-21T15:04:29Z Violence? In the Past Considerations on its Approach in Bioarchaeology La ¿Violencia? En el pasado reflexiones sobre su abordaje en bioarqueología Violência? No passado, reflexões sobre sua abordagem na bioarqueologia Bettera Marcat, Gianina Paladea Rojo, Ailem Seldes, Veronica Bioarchaeology violence ontological turn reflexivity Bioarqueología violencia giro ontológico reflexividad In this paper we discuss the legitimized ways of " making science " by the academy and, as part of this process, those frames of reference considered valid for inferences in archaeology and bioarchaeology. Based on bioarchaeological violence studies and the interpretations that result from trauma analyses, we question the ways in which these indicators are named and referred to in research, as well as bioarchaeological indicators of conflict are described and quantified. In this sense, we propose the exercise of considering other ontologies of knowledge as theoretical alternatives for the inferences and interpretations of traumatic injuries. Thus, we consider the contributions of philosophical trends such as the ontological turn and the decolonial turn, decentring ourselves from the Western perspective proposed by modern science in order to apprehend the experiences of those who went through these events. En este trabajo reflexionamos sobre las formas legitimadas de “hacer ciencia” por la academia y, como parte de este proceso, de aquellos marcos de referencia considerados válidos para las inferencias en Arqueología y Bioarqueología. A partir de los estudios sobre violencia en Bioarqueología y las interpretaciones que se desprenden de los análisis de traumas, nos interrogamos sobre las formas de nombrar y referirse a estos indicadores en las investigaciones así como la manera en la que se describen y cuantifican los indicadores bioarqueológicos de conflicto. En este sentido, proponemos el ejercicio de considerar otras ontologías de conocimiento como alternativas teóricas para las inferencias e interpretaciones de las lesiones traumáticas, contemplando los aportes de corrientes filosóficas como el giro ontológico y el giro decolonial, descentrándonos de la mirada occidental propuesta por la ciencia moderna a efectos de aprehender las vivencias y experiencias de quienes atravesaron estos eventos. Neste artigo, refletimos sobre as formas legitimadas de "fazer ciência" pela academia e, como parte desse processo, sobre os quadros de referência considerados válidos para inferências em arqueologia e bioarqueologia. Com base nos estudos sobre violência na bioarqueologia e nas interpretações que emergem das análises de trauma, questionamos as formas como esses indicadores são nomeados e mencionados nas pesquisas, bem como a maneira como os indicadores bioarqueológicos de conflito são descritos e quantificados. Nesse sentido, propomos o exercício de considerar outras ontologias do conhecimento como alternativas teóricas para as inferências e interpretações das lesões traumáticas, contemplando as contribuições de correntes filosóficas como a virada ontológica e a virada decolonial, descentrando-nos do olhar ocidental proposto pela ciência moderna para apreender as experiências daqueles que passaram por esses eventos. Centro de Estudios Históricos. UA CONICET 2023-12-15 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion texto application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/comechingonia/article/view/39948 10.37603/2250.7728.v27.n3.39948 Comechingonia. Revista de Arqueología; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2023): Comechingonia Revista de Arqueología 27 (3); 109-127 Comechingonia. Revista de Arqueología; Vol. 27 Núm. 3 (2023): Comechingonia Revista de Arqueología 27 (3); 109-127 Comechingonia. Revista de Arqueología; v. 27 n. 3 (2023): Comechingonia Revista de Arqueología 27 (3); 109-127 2250-7728 0326-7911 10.37603/2250.7728.v27.n3 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/comechingonia/article/view/39948/43885 Derechos de autor 2023 Comechingonia. Revista de Arqueología https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0