Model for evaluating the proof argument in a model-based teaching context
The study starts from the general characterization of the stages that compose the process of mathematical modeling, emphasizes in a special way the stage to which our approach is focused (obtaining and validating models) and then addresses the structure of the argument proposed by Toulmin (2006) as...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Portugués |
| Publicado: |
Asociación de Profesores de Física de la Argentina
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revistaEF/article/view/35196 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R316-article-35196 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R316-article-351962023-09-12T17:01:49Z Model for evaluating the proof argument in a model-based teaching context Modelo para avaliação do argumento de prova em um contexto de ensino baseado em modelagem Coelho Rodrigues, Fredy Alvarenga Monteiro, Marco Aurélio Physics education Argumentation Argument proof Mathematical modeling Quality of the argument Ensino de Física Argumentação Argumento de prova Modelagem matemática Qualidade do argumento The study starts from the general characterization of the stages that compose the process of mathematical modeling, emphasizes in a special way the stage to which our approach is focused (obtaining and validating models) and then addresses the structure of the argument proposed by Toulmin (2006) as well as the theory of types and levels of proof in mathematics by Nicolas Balacheff (1987,1988). This last study, when placed in the context of the use of TAP (Toulmin's Argument Pattern) in a model-based teaching context configures a theoretical and methodological approach that allows analyzing the nature of the justifications and supports employed in said argumentative process as well as classifying the data and evaluating the conclusion. This tool also allows a diagnostic evaluation of the student's level of knowledge regarding the use of proof and demonstration in Physics Teaching. It is, therefore, a tool that allows combining all the elements of TAP with Nicolas Balacheff's (1987, 1988) theory of the types and levels of proof. O estudo parte da caracterização geral das etapas que compõe o processo de modelagem matemática, enfatiza de modo especial a etapa para a qual a nossa abordagem está voltada (obtenção e validação de modelos) e em seguida aborda a estrutura do argumento proposto por Toulmin (2006) bem como a teoria dos tipos e níveis de prova em matemática de Nicolas Balacheff (1987,1988). Este último estudo, quando inserido no contexto do uso do TAP (Toulmin’s Argument Pattern) em um contexto de ensino baseado em modelagem configura uma abordagem teórica e metodológica que permite analisar a natureza das justificativas e apoios empregados no referido processo argumentativo bem como classificar os dados e avaliar a conclusão. Esta ferramenta também permite realizar uma avaliação diagnóstica do nível de conhecimento do aluno em elação ao emprego da prova e demonstração no Ensino de Física.Trata-se, portanto, de um instrumento que permite combinar todos os elementos do TAP à teoria de Nicolas Balacheff (1987, 1988) sobre os tipos e níveis de prova. Asociación de Profesores de Física de la Argentina 2021-11-05 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revistaEF/article/view/35196 10.55767/2451.6007.v33.n2.35196 Journal of Physics Teaching; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2021): July - December; 143-151 Revista de Enseñanza de la Física; Vol. 33 Núm. 2 (2021): Julio - Diciembre; 143-151 Revista de Enseñanza de la Física; v. 33 n. 2 (2021): Julho - Dezembro; 143-151 2250-6101 0326-7091 por https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revistaEF/article/view/35196/35336 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revistaEF/article/view/35196/35345 Derechos de autor 2021 Fredy Coelho Rodrigues, Marco Aurélio Alvarenga Monteiro http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-316 |
| container_title_str |
Revista de Enseñanza de la Física |
| language |
Portugués |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Physics education Argumentation Argument proof Mathematical modeling Quality of the argument Ensino de Física Argumentação Argumento de prova Modelagem matemática Qualidade do argumento |
| spellingShingle |
Physics education Argumentation Argument proof Mathematical modeling Quality of the argument Ensino de Física Argumentação Argumento de prova Modelagem matemática Qualidade do argumento Coelho Rodrigues, Fredy Alvarenga Monteiro, Marco Aurélio Model for evaluating the proof argument in a model-based teaching context |
| topic_facet |
Physics education Argumentation Argument proof Mathematical modeling Quality of the argument Ensino de Física Argumentação Argumento de prova Modelagem matemática Qualidade do argumento |
| author |
Coelho Rodrigues, Fredy Alvarenga Monteiro, Marco Aurélio |
| author_facet |
Coelho Rodrigues, Fredy Alvarenga Monteiro, Marco Aurélio |
| author_sort |
Coelho Rodrigues, Fredy |
| title |
Model for evaluating the proof argument in a model-based teaching context |
| title_short |
Model for evaluating the proof argument in a model-based teaching context |
| title_full |
Model for evaluating the proof argument in a model-based teaching context |
| title_fullStr |
Model for evaluating the proof argument in a model-based teaching context |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Model for evaluating the proof argument in a model-based teaching context |
| title_sort |
model for evaluating the proof argument in a model-based teaching context |
| description |
The study starts from the general characterization of the stages that compose the process of mathematical modeling, emphasizes in a special way the stage to which our approach is focused (obtaining and validating models) and then addresses the structure of the argument proposed by Toulmin (2006) as well as the theory of types and levels of proof in mathematics by Nicolas Balacheff (1987,1988). This last study, when placed in the context of the use of TAP (Toulmin's Argument Pattern) in a model-based teaching context configures a theoretical and methodological approach that allows analyzing the nature of the justifications and supports employed in said argumentative process as well as classifying the data and evaluating the conclusion. This tool also allows a diagnostic evaluation of the student's level of knowledge regarding the use of proof and demonstration in Physics Teaching. It is, therefore, a tool that allows combining all the elements of TAP with Nicolas Balacheff's (1987, 1988) theory of the types and levels of proof. |
| publisher |
Asociación de Profesores de Física de la Argentina |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revistaEF/article/view/35196 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT coelhorodriguesfredy modelforevaluatingtheproofargumentinamodelbasedteachingcontext AT alvarengamonteiromarcoaurelio modelforevaluatingtheproofargumentinamodelbasedteachingcontext AT coelhorodriguesfredy modeloparaavaliacaodoargumentodeprovaemumcontextodeensinobaseadoemmodelagem AT alvarengamonteiromarcoaurelio modeloparaavaliacaodoargumentodeprovaemumcontextodeensinobaseadoemmodelagem |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T20:40:07Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-09-03T20:40:07Z |
| _version_ |
1809208844148015104 |