WhatsApp as evidence. Procedural and Constitutional Questions

In this article its analyzed WhatsApp as evidence and questions from the Procedural Law and Constitutional scope. As first premise, it’s analyzed WhatsApp as an unnominated way to proof and the principle of freedom of proof. As second premise, it to consider WhatsApp as an unsigned instrument. Third...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robledo, Miguel, Robledo, Federico
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/procesal/article/view/40815
Aporte de:
id I10-R301-article-40815
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R301-article-408152023-06-28T21:07:15Z WhatsApp as evidence. Procedural and Constitutional Questions La prueba de WhatsApp. Cuestiones procesales y constitucionales WhatsApp comme preuve. Questions procédurales et constitutionnelles WhatsApp come prova. Questioni procedurali e costituzionali WhatsApp como prova. Questões Processuais e Constitucionais Robledo, Miguel Robledo, Federico WhatsApp Evidence Freedom of Proof Procedural Law Constitutional Law WhatsApp Prueba Libertad probatoria Derecho Procesal Derecho constitucional In this article its analyzed WhatsApp as evidence and questions from the Procedural Law and Constitutional scope. As first premise, it’s analyzed WhatsApp as an unnominated way to proof and the principle of freedom of proof. As second premise, it to consider WhatsApp as an unsigned instrument. Third premise is to consider WhatsApp as correspondence and its constitutional and conventional consequences. Last it is analyzed the evidence activity and presents conclusions. En el presente artículo se analiza cuestiones procesales y constitucionales de la Prueba de WhatsApp. Como primera premisa se analiza WhatsApp como un medio probatorio innominado a la luz del principio de libertad probatoria. Como segunda premisa se analiza a WhatsApp como un instrumento particular no firmado. Como tercer premisa se analiza a WhatsApp como correspondencia y sus proyecciones constitucionales y convencionales. Por último, se analiza la actividad probatoria y se presenta las conclusiones. Dans cet article, WhatsApp a été analysé comme preuve et questions de la loi procédurale et de la portée constitutionnelle. Comme première prémisse, il a analysé WhatsApp comme un moyen de preuve non désigné et le principe de la liberté de preuve. Comme deuxième prémisse, il s'agit de considérer WhatsApp comme un instrument particulier non signé. La troisième prémisse est de considérer WhatsApp comme une correspondance et ses conséquences constitutionnelles et conventionnelles. Enfin, il est analysé l'activité de preuve et présente des conclusions. In questo articolo viene analizzato WhatsApp come prove e questioni dal diritto processuale e dall'ambito costituzionale. Come prima premessa, viene analizzato WhatsApp come un modo anonimo di provare e il principio della libertà di prova. Come seconda premessa, è da considerare WhatsApp come uno strumento particolare non firmato. Terza premessa è considerare WhatsApp come corrispondenza e le sue conseguenze costituzionali e convenzionali. Infine viene analizzata l'attività di prova e presenta conclusioni. Neste artigo analisa-se o WhatsApp como prova e questionamentos no âmbito do Direito Processual e Constitucional. Como primeira premissa, analisa-se o WhatsApp como meio não nomeado de prova e o princípio da liberdade de prova. Como segunda premissa, cabe considerar o WhatsApp como um instrumento particular não assinado. A terceira premissa é considerar o WhatsApp como correspondência e suas consequências constitucionais e convencionais. Por último analisa-se a actividade de prova e apresenta-se as conclusões. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología 2023-03-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/procesal/article/view/40815 Journal of Procedural Law and Human Rights; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Procedural acts and new tecnologies; 187-201 Revista Derecho Procesal y Derechos Humanos ; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2022): Los actos procesales y las nuevas tecnologías; 187-201 Journal du droit procédural et des droits de l'homme; Vol. 1 No 1 (2022): Acte de procédure et nouvelles technologies; 187-201 Revista de Direito Processual e Direitos Humanos; v. 1 n. 1 (2022): Procedure ; 187-201 2953-5387 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/procesal/article/view/40815/41639 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-301
container_title_str Revista Derecho Procesal y Derechos Humanos
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic WhatsApp
Evidence
Freedom of Proof
Procedural Law
Constitutional Law
WhatsApp
Prueba
Libertad probatoria
Derecho Procesal
Derecho constitucional
spellingShingle WhatsApp
Evidence
Freedom of Proof
Procedural Law
Constitutional Law
WhatsApp
Prueba
Libertad probatoria
Derecho Procesal
Derecho constitucional
Robledo, Miguel
Robledo, Federico
WhatsApp as evidence. Procedural and Constitutional Questions
topic_facet WhatsApp
Evidence
Freedom of Proof
Procedural Law
Constitutional Law
WhatsApp
Prueba
Libertad probatoria
Derecho Procesal
Derecho constitucional
author Robledo, Miguel
Robledo, Federico
author_facet Robledo, Miguel
Robledo, Federico
author_sort Robledo, Miguel
title WhatsApp as evidence. Procedural and Constitutional Questions
title_short WhatsApp as evidence. Procedural and Constitutional Questions
title_full WhatsApp as evidence. Procedural and Constitutional Questions
title_fullStr WhatsApp as evidence. Procedural and Constitutional Questions
title_full_unstemmed WhatsApp as evidence. Procedural and Constitutional Questions
title_sort whatsapp as evidence. procedural and constitutional questions
description In this article its analyzed WhatsApp as evidence and questions from the Procedural Law and Constitutional scope. As first premise, it’s analyzed WhatsApp as an unnominated way to proof and the principle of freedom of proof. As second premise, it to consider WhatsApp as an unsigned instrument. Third premise is to consider WhatsApp as correspondence and its constitutional and conventional consequences. Last it is analyzed the evidence activity and presents conclusions.
publisher Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología
publishDate 2023
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/procesal/article/view/40815
work_keys_str_mv AT robledomiguel whatsappasevidenceproceduralandconstitutionalquestions
AT robledofederico whatsappasevidenceproceduralandconstitutionalquestions
AT robledomiguel lapruebadewhatsappcuestionesprocesalesyconstitucionales
AT robledofederico lapruebadewhatsappcuestionesprocesalesyconstitucionales
AT robledomiguel whatsappcommepreuvequestionsproceduralesetconstitutionnelles
AT robledofederico whatsappcommepreuvequestionsproceduralesetconstitutionnelles
AT robledomiguel whatsappcomeprovaquestioniproceduraliecostituzionali
AT robledofederico whatsappcomeprovaquestioniproceduraliecostituzionali
AT robledomiguel whatsappcomoprovaquestoesprocessuaiseconstitucionais
AT robledofederico whatsappcomoprovaquestoesprocessuaiseconstitucionais
first_indexed 2024-09-03T20:22:26Z
last_indexed 2025-02-05T21:59:17Z
_version_ 1849918442538270720