The coexistence of different perspectives from who thinks? within the epistemological plane

This article proposes how the different optics inside the epistemological plane could be used to think about the professional frame of Psychology. In the same perspective, it shows that the proposal of Haraway about the situated subject and inclusive can be seen in what is established by Draper and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Manuali, Micaela
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Cátedra B de Problemas Epistemológicos de la Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/36212
Aporte de:
id I10-R299-article-36212
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R299-article-362122026-05-22T18:34:30Z The coexistence of different perspectives from who thinks? within the epistemological plane La coexistencia de diversas ópticas desde el ¿quién piensa?, dentro del plano epistemológico Manuali, Micaela Manuali, Micaela óptica diálogo marco profesional paro interseccionalidad feminismos optical dialogue professional context strike intersectionality feminism This article proposes how the different optics inside the epistemological plane could be used to think about the professional frame of Psychology. In the same perspective, it shows that the proposal of Haraway about the situated subject and inclusive can be seen in what is established by Draper and Gago on the action of the strike, in the way in which its intersectionality allows it to be observed. Este artículo analiza cómo las diversas ópticas dentro del plano epistemológico pueden ser empleadas para pensar dentro del marco profesional de la Psicología. En la misma perspectiva, evidencia que la propuesta de Haraway sobre el sujeto encarnado e inclusivo puede observarse en lo establecido por Drapper y Gago sobre la acción del Paro, en la manera en que la interseccionalidad del mismo permite observarlo. Cátedra B de Problemas Epistemológicos de la Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 2021-12-27 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/36212 Heterocronías. Feminismos y Epistemologías del Sur; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2021): Heterocronías Vol. 3, N° 2; 64-71 Heterocronías. Feminisms and Epistemologies of the South; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Heterocronías Vol. 3, N° 2; 64-71 2684-0502 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/36212/36753 Derechos de autor 2021 Heterocronías https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-299
container_title_str Heterocronías. Feminismos y Epistemologías del Sur
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic óptica
diálogo
marco profesional
paro
interseccionalidad
feminismos
optical
dialogue
professional context
strike
intersectionality
feminism
spellingShingle óptica
diálogo
marco profesional
paro
interseccionalidad
feminismos
optical
dialogue
professional context
strike
intersectionality
feminism
Manuali, Micaela
Manuali, Micaela
The coexistence of different perspectives from who thinks? within the epistemological plane
topic_facet óptica
diálogo
marco profesional
paro
interseccionalidad
feminismos
optical
dialogue
professional context
strike
intersectionality
feminism
author Manuali, Micaela
Manuali, Micaela
author_facet Manuali, Micaela
Manuali, Micaela
author_sort Manuali, Micaela
title The coexistence of different perspectives from who thinks? within the epistemological plane
title_short The coexistence of different perspectives from who thinks? within the epistemological plane
title_full The coexistence of different perspectives from who thinks? within the epistemological plane
title_fullStr The coexistence of different perspectives from who thinks? within the epistemological plane
title_full_unstemmed The coexistence of different perspectives from who thinks? within the epistemological plane
title_sort coexistence of different perspectives from who thinks? within the epistemological plane
description This article proposes how the different optics inside the epistemological plane could be used to think about the professional frame of Psychology. In the same perspective, it shows that the proposal of Haraway about the situated subject and inclusive can be seen in what is established by Draper and Gago on the action of the strike, in the way in which its intersectionality allows it to be observed.
publisher Cátedra B de Problemas Epistemológicos de la Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
publishDate 2021
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/36212
work_keys_str_mv AT manualimicaela thecoexistenceofdifferentperspectivesfromwhothinkswithintheepistemologicalplane
AT manualimicaela thecoexistenceofdifferentperspectivesfromwhothinkswithintheepistemologicalplane
AT manualimicaela lacoexistenciadediversasopticasdesdeelquienpiensadentrodelplanoepistemologico
AT manualimicaela lacoexistenciadediversasopticasdesdeelquienpiensadentrodelplanoepistemologico
AT manualimicaela coexistenceofdifferentperspectivesfromwhothinkswithintheepistemologicalplane
AT manualimicaela coexistenceofdifferentperspectivesfromwhothinkswithintheepistemologicalplane
first_indexed 2024-09-03T20:21:07Z
last_indexed 2026-05-27T05:23:58Z
_version_ 1866317890848817152