Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH.

To analyze the effect of two mouthwashes on salivary pH and correlate it with age, buffer capacity and saliva flow rate in healthy volunteers, a crossover phase IV clinical study involving three age-based groups was designed. Two commercial mouthwashes (MW), Cool Mint Listerine® (MWa) and Periobac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belardinelli, P.A., Morelatto, R.A., Benavidez, T.E., Baruzzi, A.M., López de Blanc, S.A
Formato: article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana : AOL. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11086/4914
Aporte de:
id I10-R14111086-4914
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-141
collection Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
language Inglés
topic Saliva
Mouthwashes
Tooth erosion
Tooth wear
spellingShingle Saliva
Mouthwashes
Tooth erosion
Tooth wear
Belardinelli, P.A.
Morelatto, R.A.
Benavidez, T.E.
Baruzzi, A.M.
López de Blanc, S.A
Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH.
topic_facet Saliva
Mouthwashes
Tooth erosion
Tooth wear
description To analyze the effect of two mouthwashes on salivary pH and correlate it with age, buffer capacity and saliva flow rate in healthy volunteers, a crossover phase IV clinical study involving three age-based groups was designed. Two commercial mouthwashes (MW), Cool Mint Listerine® (MWa) and Periobacter ® (MWb) were used. The unstimulated saliva of each individual was first characterized by measuring flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity. Salivary pH was evaluated before rinsing with a given MW, immediately after rinsing, 5 minutes later, and then every 10 min (at 15, 25, 35 min) until the baseline pH was recovered. Paired t-test, ANOVA with a randomized block design, and Pearson correlation tests were used. Averages were 0.63 mL/min, 7.06, and 0.87 for flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity, respectively. An immediate significant increase in salivary pH was observed after rinsing, reaching average values of 7.24(MWb) and 7.30 (MWa), which declined to an almost stable value 15minutes. The great increase in salivary pH, after MW use shows that saliva is a dynamic system, and that the organism is capable of responding to a stimulus with changes in its composition. It is thus evident that pH of the external agent alone is not a good indicator for its erosive potential because biological systems tend to neutralize it. The results of this study enhance the importance of in vivo measurements and reinforce the concept of the protective action of saliva.
format article
author Belardinelli, P.A.
Morelatto, R.A.
Benavidez, T.E.
Baruzzi, A.M.
López de Blanc, S.A
author_facet Belardinelli, P.A.
Morelatto, R.A.
Benavidez, T.E.
Baruzzi, A.M.
López de Blanc, S.A
author_sort Belardinelli, P.A.
title Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH.
title_short Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH.
title_full Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH.
title_fullStr Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH.
title_full_unstemmed Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary PH.
title_sort effect of two mouthwashes on salivary ph.
publisher Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana : AOL.
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/11086/4914
work_keys_str_mv AT belardinellipa effectoftwomouthwashesonsalivaryph
AT morelattora effectoftwomouthwashesonsalivaryph
AT benavidezte effectoftwomouthwashesonsalivaryph
AT baruzziam effectoftwomouthwashesonsalivaryph
AT lopezdeblancsa effectoftwomouthwashesonsalivaryph
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820396494815235