id I10-R141-11086-552552
record_format dspace
spelling I10-R141-11086-5525522024-07-26T18:53:06Z The Limitations of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses in Sport Science. Editorial Boullosa, Daniel Behm, David Del Rosso, Sebastián Schumann, Moritz Doma, Kenji Foster, Carl https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8477-127X https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9406-6056 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2572-5887 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8903-0067 https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1406-9283 Limitations Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses Gold standard Scientific evidence info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Fil: Boullosa, Daniel. Universidad de León, España. Fil: Behm, David. Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada. Fil: Del Rosso, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Argentina. Fil: Del Rosso, Sebastián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología, Argentina. Fil: Schumann, Moritz. Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany. Fil: Doma, Kenji. James Cook University, Australia. Fil: Foster, Carl. University of Wisconsin–La Crosse, United States of America. It is generally argued that systematic reviews are necessary because of the possibility of some subjective bias in narrative reviews. Thus, SRwMs are considered the gold standard of scientific evidence. However, “all that glitters is not gold,”2 as SRwMs are only as good as the articles they contain, not only from a risk-of-bias perspective2 but also when considering the characteristics of the samples, protocols, and outcomes included. Generalizations may erroneously pretend to be a one-size-fits-all solution for complex biological phenomena. When considering the factors and potential moderators of training interventions and subsequent performance and physiological adaptations, a suite of population characteristics (eg, training background, age, sex), training-regimen characteristics (eg, exercise type and mode, loading, timing), testing protocols and selected outcomes (eg, exercise type, performance parameter, timing), and other contextual factors should be included. Consideration of all these factors is important for a better characterization of any (acute or chronic) training effect on an individual athlete basis, as previously exemplified for postactivation performance-enhancement strategies.3 However, this approach is not always possible for most SRwMs and the included studies. This shortcoming means that any analysis from an SRwM may be limited because of the infinite combinations of all those potential factors and their moderators, which may result in suboptimal combinations. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Fil: Boullosa, Daniel. Universidad de León, España. Fil: Behm, David. Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada. Fil: Del Rosso, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas. Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Argentina. Fil: Del Rosso, Sebastián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología, Argentina. Fil: Schumann, Moritz. Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany. Fil: Doma, Kenji. James Cook University, Australia. Fil: Foster, Carl. University of Wisconsin–La Crosse, United States of America. 2024-07-04T13:16:31Z 2024-07-04T13:16:31Z 2024-04-24 article Boullosa D, Behm D, Del Rosso S, et al. The Limitations of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses in Sport Science. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2024 Jun;19(6):517-518. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2024-0155. PMID: 38663854. http://hdl.handle.net/11086/552552 1555-0273 https://journals.humankinetics.com/configurable/content/journals$002fijspp$002f19$002f6$002farticle-p517.xml?t%3Aac=journals%24002fijspp%24002f19%24002f6%24002farticle-p517.xml&content=fulltext https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0155 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-141
collection Repositorio Digital Universitario (UNC)
language Inglés
topic Limitations
Systematic Reviews
Meta-Analyses
Gold standard
Scientific evidence
spellingShingle Limitations
Systematic Reviews
Meta-Analyses
Gold standard
Scientific evidence
Boullosa, Daniel
Behm, David
Del Rosso, Sebastián
Schumann, Moritz
Doma, Kenji
Foster, Carl
The Limitations of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses in Sport Science. Editorial
topic_facet Limitations
Systematic Reviews
Meta-Analyses
Gold standard
Scientific evidence
description Fil: Boullosa, Daniel. Universidad de León, España.
author2 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8477-127X
author_facet https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8477-127X
Boullosa, Daniel
Behm, David
Del Rosso, Sebastián
Schumann, Moritz
Doma, Kenji
Foster, Carl
format publishedVersion
article
author Boullosa, Daniel
Behm, David
Del Rosso, Sebastián
Schumann, Moritz
Doma, Kenji
Foster, Carl
author_sort Boullosa, Daniel
title The Limitations of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses in Sport Science. Editorial
title_short The Limitations of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses in Sport Science. Editorial
title_full The Limitations of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses in Sport Science. Editorial
title_fullStr The Limitations of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses in Sport Science. Editorial
title_full_unstemmed The Limitations of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses in Sport Science. Editorial
title_sort limitations of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in sport science. editorial
publishDate 2024
url http://hdl.handle.net/11086/552552
https://journals.humankinetics.com/configurable/content/journals$002fijspp$002f19$002f6$002farticle-p517.xml?t%3Aac=journals%24002fijspp%24002f19%24002f6%24002farticle-p517.xml&content=fulltext
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0155
work_keys_str_mv AT boullosadaniel thelimitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
AT behmdavid thelimitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
AT delrossosebastian thelimitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
AT schumannmoritz thelimitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
AT domakenji thelimitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
AT fostercarl thelimitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
AT boullosadaniel limitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
AT behmdavid limitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
AT delrossosebastian limitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
AT schumannmoritz limitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
AT domakenji limitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
AT fostercarl limitationsofsystematicreviewswithmetaanalysesinsportscienceeditorial
_version_ 1806948464211263488