Government Fiscal and Real Economy Responses to the Crises: Automatic Stabilisers versus Automatic Stabilisation
This paper looks at the discretionary fi scal and real economy support measures introduced by EMU Member States in response to the crises. The analyses build on a data base assembled by the Commission on individual crises response measures with a view to survey the implementation of the European Eco...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo revista |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Instituto de Economía y Finanzas. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Universidada Nacional de Córdoba.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/REyE/article/view/3869 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I10-R10article-3869 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
institution_str |
I-10 |
repository_str |
R-10 |
container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
language |
Inglés |
format |
Artículo revista |
topic |
automatic stabilisers European Economic Recovery Programme (EERP) budget discretionary policies E6 H2 H3 H6 estabilizadores automáticos Plan Europeo de Recuperación Económica (PERE) presupuesto políticas discrecionales E6 H2 H6 H3 |
spellingShingle |
automatic stabilisers European Economic Recovery Programme (EERP) budget discretionary policies E6 H2 H3 H6 estabilizadores automáticos Plan Europeo de Recuperación Económica (PERE) presupuesto políticas discrecionales E6 H2 H6 H3 Fischer, Jonas Justo, Isabelle Government Fiscal and Real Economy Responses to the Crises: Automatic Stabilisers versus Automatic Stabilisation |
topic_facet |
automatic stabilisers European Economic Recovery Programme (EERP) budget discretionary policies E6 H2 H3 H6 estabilizadores automáticos Plan Europeo de Recuperación Económica (PERE) presupuesto políticas discrecionales E6 H2 H6 H3 |
author |
Fischer, Jonas Justo, Isabelle |
author_facet |
Fischer, Jonas Justo, Isabelle |
author_sort |
Fischer, Jonas |
title |
Government Fiscal and Real Economy Responses to the Crises: Automatic Stabilisers versus Automatic Stabilisation |
title_short |
Government Fiscal and Real Economy Responses to the Crises: Automatic Stabilisers versus Automatic Stabilisation |
title_full |
Government Fiscal and Real Economy Responses to the Crises: Automatic Stabilisers versus Automatic Stabilisation |
title_fullStr |
Government Fiscal and Real Economy Responses to the Crises: Automatic Stabilisers versus Automatic Stabilisation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Government Fiscal and Real Economy Responses to the Crises: Automatic Stabilisers versus Automatic Stabilisation |
title_sort |
government fiscal and real economy responses to the crises: automatic stabilisers versus automatic stabilisation |
description |
This paper looks at the discretionary fi scal and real economy support measures introduced by EMU Member States in response to the crises. The analyses build on a data base assembled by the Commission on individual crises response measures with a view to survey the implementation of the European Economic Recovery Programme (EERP). The paper first provides a broad overview of the types of crises-related measures taken, including broad estimates of their budgetary dimension. On this basis it appears that on an aggregate level, the discretionary support has been in line with agreed principles of being timely, temporary and targeted. Member States with restricted fi scal space has overall taken a more restrictive stance than those with more room of manoeuvre. The paper then looks at how these discretionary measures complement the "automatic" budget tabilisation. It appears that, in budgetary terms, about half of the discretionary measures add to the areas already covered by automatic stabilisers while the other half address other areas such as investments, industrial sectors and vulnerable groups particularly hit by the crises. The overall experience may suggest that it has been helpful with agreed ex-ante principles for how discretionary stimuli should be provided and that the provision of discretionary stimulus under such conditionality can work to strengthen the budgetary stabilisation capacity in a flexible way. |
publisher |
Instituto de Economía y Finanzas. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Universidada Nacional de Córdoba. |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/REyE/article/view/3869 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fischerjonas governmentfiscalandrealeconomyresponsestothecrisesautomaticstabilisersversusautomaticstabilisation AT justoisabelle governmentfiscalandrealeconomyresponsestothecrisesautomaticstabilisersversusautomaticstabilisation AT fischerjonas respuestasfiscalesdelgobiernoydelaeconomiarealalascrisisestabilizadoresautomaticosversusestabilizacionautomatica AT justoisabelle respuestasfiscalesdelgobiernoydelaeconomiarealalascrisisestabilizadoresautomaticosversusestabilizacionautomatica |
bdutipo_str |
Revistas |
_version_ |
1764819783881064449 |