Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method
Introduction: Two different methods are used in goniometry of the ankle: the neutral zero method (N0M) and the bone reference method (BRM). In addition, the N0M has a subtype (N0I), with a different technique. Purpose: To determine the average of the amplitude of flexion-extension of the ankle, meas...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional Cba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27655 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R10article-27655 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-10 |
| container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
arthrometry articular articular range of motion ankle applied kinesiology artrometría articular rango del movimiento articular tobillo quinesiología aplicada artrometria articular amplitude de movimento articular tornozelo cinesiologia aplicada |
| spellingShingle |
arthrometry articular articular range of motion ankle applied kinesiology artrometría articular rango del movimiento articular tobillo quinesiología aplicada artrometria articular amplitude de movimento articular tornozelo cinesiologia aplicada Catelotti, Franco Trossero, Silvina Marcos, Roxana Alicia Romero, Daniel Lo Presti, María Silvina Barboza, Gladys Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| topic_facet |
arthrometry articular articular range of motion ankle applied kinesiology artrometría articular rango del movimiento articular tobillo quinesiología aplicada artrometria articular amplitude de movimento articular tornozelo cinesiologia aplicada |
| author |
Catelotti, Franco Trossero, Silvina Marcos, Roxana Alicia Romero, Daniel Lo Presti, María Silvina Barboza, Gladys |
| author_facet |
Catelotti, Franco Trossero, Silvina Marcos, Roxana Alicia Romero, Daniel Lo Presti, María Silvina Barboza, Gladys |
| author_sort |
Catelotti, Franco |
| title |
Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| title_short |
Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| title_full |
Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| title_fullStr |
Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| title_sort |
goniometry of flexion-extension ankle movement: comparative analysis between bone reference method and neutral 0 method |
| description |
Introduction: Two different methods are used in goniometry of the ankle: the neutral zero method (N0M) and the bone reference method (BRM). In addition, the N0M has a subtype (N0I), with a different technique. Purpose: To determine the average of the amplitude of flexion-extension of the ankle, measured in different body positions, using N0M, N0I and BRM, in young adults of both sexes, with the objective of providing evidence so that the ankle goniometry is more reliable. Material and methods: 190 students from the School of Kinesiology and Physiotherapy were studied, using the three methods of joint measurement in 4 different body positions; the amplitude of flex-extension in an ankle per student was evaluated. Results: In most positions, the measurements were different in the three methods compared (P<0.05). The M0 and M0I methods yielded similar results in some comparisons. The patient's position also significantly influences the result obtained. Dorsal ankle flexion was similar between men and women in most of the methods and positions; the plantar flexion that was greater in women in all cases (P<0.0001). The full flex-extension value, in most cases, was higher in women than in men (P<0.001). Conclusions: Both the method and the patient's position significantly influence the results of the goniometric measurement. Gender influences the joint width of the plantar ankle flexion, regardless of the measurement method used. |
| publisher |
Universidad Nacional Cba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/27655 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT catelottifranco goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT trosserosilvina goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT marcosroxanaalicia goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT romerodaniel goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT loprestimariasilvina goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT barbozagladys goniometryofflexionextensionanklemovementcomparativeanalysisbetweenbonereferencemethodandneutral0method AT catelottifranco goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT trosserosilvina goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT marcosroxanaalicia goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT romerodaniel goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT loprestimariasilvina goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT barbozagladys goniometriadelmovimientodeflexoextensiondetobilloanalisiscomparativoentremetododereferenciasoseasymetodo0neutral AT catelottifranco goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 AT trosserosilvina goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 AT marcosroxanaalicia goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 AT romerodaniel goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 AT loprestimariasilvina goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 AT barbozagladys goniometriadomovimentodeflexaoextensaodotornozeloanalisecomparativaentreometododereferenciaosseaeometodoneutro0 |
| bdutipo_str |
Revistas |
| _version_ |
1764819783435419648 |