The MERCOSUR, geography in dispute

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

In its 25 years of history, MERCOSUR has been the expression of an economic, political, cultural and legal-institutional geography on which various projectsthat have striven for hegemony in South America have taken shape. This articledevelops this idea by laying out three forms of consensus, or sets...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Vázquez, Mariana
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia 2018
Materias:
MERCOSUR
Open Regionalism
Autonomous Regionalism
Geography in Dispute
Regionalismo abierto
Regionalismo autonómico
Geografía en disputa
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RIHALC/article/view/20488
Aporte de:
Revistas de la UNC de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R10article-20488
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic MERCOSUR
Open Regionalism
Autonomous Regionalism
Geography in Dispute
MERCOSUR
Regionalismo abierto
Regionalismo autonómico
Geografía en disputa
spellingShingle MERCOSUR
Open Regionalism
Autonomous Regionalism
Geography in Dispute
MERCOSUR
Regionalismo abierto
Regionalismo autonómico
Geografía en disputa
Vázquez, Mariana
The MERCOSUR, geography in dispute
topic_facet MERCOSUR
Open Regionalism
Autonomous Regionalism
Geography in Dispute
MERCOSUR
Regionalismo abierto
Regionalismo autonómico
Geografía en disputa
author Vázquez, Mariana
author_facet Vázquez, Mariana
author_sort Vázquez, Mariana
title The MERCOSUR, geography in dispute
title_short The MERCOSUR, geography in dispute
title_full The MERCOSUR, geography in dispute
title_fullStr The MERCOSUR, geography in dispute
title_full_unstemmed The MERCOSUR, geography in dispute
title_sort mercosur, geography in dispute
description In its 25 years of history, MERCOSUR has been the expression of an economic, political, cultural and legal-institutional geography on which various projectsthat have striven for hegemony in South America have taken shape. This articledevelops this idea by laying out three forms of consensus, or sets of ideas and policies, that have successively struggled for prevalence in the various eras that the region has gone through - with an uncertain outcome in the case of the latest one. The major contradiction, today as in the past, is that between an autonomous integration project and a deeply dependent integration project.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia
publishDate 2018
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RIHALC/article/view/20488
work_keys_str_mv AT vazquezmariana themercosurgeographyindispute
AT vazquezmariana elmercosurgeografiaendisputa
AT vazquezmariana mercosurgeographyindispute
bdutipo_str Revistas
_version_ 1764819781326733315

Ejemplares similares