Philosophical anarchism and political anarchism

In this paper I study, first, the relationship between philosophical and political anarchism and particularly the classification of the various anarchists positions offered by John Simmon in his “Philosophical Anarchism”. While political anarchism considers that it is morally obligatory to work towa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Iosa, Juan
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Derecho 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6014
Aporte de:
id I10-R10-article-6014
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R10-article-60142019-03-27T13:39:06Z Philosophical anarchism and political anarchism Anarquismo filosófico y anarquismo político Iosa, Juan anarquismo filosófico anarquismo político anarquismo a priori anarquismo a posteriori John Simmons philosophical anarchism political anarchism a priori anarchism a posteriori anarchism John Simmons In this paper I study, first, the relationship between philosophical and political anarchism and particularly the classification of the various anarchists positions offered by John Simmon in his “Philosophical Anarchism”. While political anarchism considers that it is morally obligatory to work towards the elimination of the state, philosophical anarchism only states that there is no obligation to obey the law. From here on it is possible to mistakenly infer that political anarchism is practical while philosophical anarchism is merely theoretical. Hence my second goal in this work is to explicit the practical commitments involved by taking philosophical anarchism as the correct thesis regarding the legitimacy of the state. Finally, I will show that just as there are good reasons for considering philosophical anarchism as a prima facie sound, worthy of attention theory, there are good reasons to reject political anarchism. En este trabajo estudio, en primer lugar, la relación entre anarquismo filosófico y anarquismo político y particularmente la clasificación de las diversas posturas anarquistas que ofrece John Simmon en su trabajo “Philosophical Anarchism”. Mientras que el anarquismo político considera que es moralmente obligatorio actuar en pro de la eliminación del estado, el filosófico sólo afirma que no hay una obligación de obedecer el derecho. De aquí puede equivocadamente inferirse que el anarquismo político es práctico mientras que el filosófico es meramente teórico. De aquí que mi segundo objetivo en este trabajo sea explicitar los compromisos prácticos que conlleva asumir el anarquismo filosófico como la tesis correcta en cuanto a la legitimidad del estado. Por último, pretendo mostrar que así como hay buenas razones para considerar el anarquismo filosófico como una teoría prima facie sensata, digna de atención, también hay buenas razones para rechazar el anarquismo político. Facultad de Derecho 2013-04-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6014 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2013): Nueva Serie II 2314-3061 1850-9371 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6014/7087 Derechos de autor 2013 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic anarquismo filosófico
anarquismo político
anarquismo a priori
anarquismo a posteriori
John Simmons
philosophical anarchism
political anarchism
a priori anarchism
a posteriori anarchism
John Simmons
spellingShingle anarquismo filosófico
anarquismo político
anarquismo a priori
anarquismo a posteriori
John Simmons
philosophical anarchism
political anarchism
a priori anarchism
a posteriori anarchism
John Simmons
Iosa, Juan
Philosophical anarchism and political anarchism
topic_facet anarquismo filosófico
anarquismo político
anarquismo a priori
anarquismo a posteriori
John Simmons
philosophical anarchism
political anarchism
a priori anarchism
a posteriori anarchism
John Simmons
author Iosa, Juan
author_facet Iosa, Juan
author_sort Iosa, Juan
title Philosophical anarchism and political anarchism
title_short Philosophical anarchism and political anarchism
title_full Philosophical anarchism and political anarchism
title_fullStr Philosophical anarchism and political anarchism
title_full_unstemmed Philosophical anarchism and political anarchism
title_sort philosophical anarchism and political anarchism
description In this paper I study, first, the relationship between philosophical and political anarchism and particularly the classification of the various anarchists positions offered by John Simmon in his “Philosophical Anarchism”. While political anarchism considers that it is morally obligatory to work towards the elimination of the state, philosophical anarchism only states that there is no obligation to obey the law. From here on it is possible to mistakenly infer that political anarchism is practical while philosophical anarchism is merely theoretical. Hence my second goal in this work is to explicit the practical commitments involved by taking philosophical anarchism as the correct thesis regarding the legitimacy of the state. Finally, I will show that just as there are good reasons for considering philosophical anarchism as a prima facie sound, worthy of attention theory, there are good reasons to reject political anarchism.
publisher Facultad de Derecho
publishDate 2013
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6014
work_keys_str_mv AT iosajuan philosophicalanarchismandpoliticalanarchism
AT iosajuan anarquismofilosoficoyanarquismopolitico
first_indexed 2022-08-20T01:21:53Z
last_indexed 2022-08-20T01:21:53Z
_version_ 1770718654490476544