Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony

This paper is about the relation between the concepts of Memory – Identity – Patrimony from an anthropological focus. Since the intrinsic ambiguity of those concepts, it´s considered the preponderant role play by the mechanism of memory/oblivion-individual identities/collective identity in the choos...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colasurdo, María Belén, Sartori, Julieta Isabel, Escudero, Sandra Cristina
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5456
Aporte de:
id I10-R10-article-5456
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R10-article-54562021-06-18T17:45:56Z Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony La implicancia de la memoria y la identidad en la constitución del patrimonio. Algunas reflexiones Colasurdo, María Belén Sartori, Julieta Isabel Escudero, Sandra Cristina memoria patrimonio identidad museo antropología memory identity patrimony museum anthropology memory identity patrimony museum anthropology This paper is about the relation between the concepts of Memory – Identity – Patrimony from an anthropological focus. Since the intrinsic ambiguity of those concepts, it´s considered the preponderant role play by the mechanism of memory/oblivion-individual identities/collective identity in the choose of what it will be considered patrimony inside a community. The concept of patrimony have not been the same along the history and its changing meaning have evolve since the idea of an illustrated treasure to the idea of a touristic resource, and rating it as a cultural product and a mechanism of identity construction. The museum is one of the institution in charge of determine and perpetuate what is consider patrimony and what is not. This could represent the past, in a reliable way or not, it could distort it from its selections and classifications, it could restrict the past because of its codes of historic representation, the way in which it tell it story, the way in which the artifacts are presented. The artifacts are gathered and presented to generate a particular sense to the visitor that observes it. En el presente trabajo se reflexiona acerca de la relación entre los conceptos de Memoria – Identidad – Patrimonio desde un enfoque antropológico. A partir de la ambigüedad intrínseca que caracteriza a los mismos, se considera el papel preponderante que juegan los mecanismos de memoria/olvido-identidades individuales/identidad colectiva en la elección de lo que será considerado patrimonio dentro de una comunidad. El concepto de patrimonio no ha sido el mismo a lo largo de la historia y su cambiante significado ha transitado, desde la idea inicial de tesoro ilustrado, hasta la de recurso turístico, pasando por su valoración como producto cultural y mecanismo de construcción de identidad. El museo es una de las instituciones que se encargan de determinar y perpetuar qué se considera patrimonio y qué no. El mismo puede representar bien o mal el pasado, puede distorsionarlo a partir de sus selecciones y clasificaciones, puede restringir el pasado a través de su código de representación histórica, la forma en que cuenta su historia, la forma en que son presentados los artefactos. Estos últimos son reunidos y presentados para generar un sentido particular para el visitante que los observa. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2010-12-26 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed article Artículo revisado por pares museología antropológica Artigo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5456 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 3 (2010) NÚMERO 1; 149-154 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 3 (2010) NÚMERO 1; 149-154 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 3 (2010) NÚMERO 1; 149-154 1852-4826 1852-060X 10.31048/1852.4826.v3.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5456/5902 Derechos de autor 2010 María Belén Colasurdo, Julieta Isabel Sartori, Sandra Cristina Escudero
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic memoria
patrimonio
identidad
museo
antropología
memory
identity
patrimony
museum
anthropology
memory
identity
patrimony
museum
anthropology
spellingShingle memoria
patrimonio
identidad
museo
antropología
memory
identity
patrimony
museum
anthropology
memory
identity
patrimony
museum
anthropology
Colasurdo, María Belén
Sartori, Julieta Isabel
Escudero, Sandra Cristina
Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony
topic_facet memoria
patrimonio
identidad
museo
antropología
memory
identity
patrimony
museum
anthropology
memory
identity
patrimony
museum
anthropology
author Colasurdo, María Belén
Sartori, Julieta Isabel
Escudero, Sandra Cristina
author_facet Colasurdo, María Belén
Sartori, Julieta Isabel
Escudero, Sandra Cristina
author_sort Colasurdo, María Belén
title Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony
title_short Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony
title_full Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony
title_fullStr Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony
title_full_unstemmed Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony
title_sort some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony
description This paper is about the relation between the concepts of Memory – Identity – Patrimony from an anthropological focus. Since the intrinsic ambiguity of those concepts, it´s considered the preponderant role play by the mechanism of memory/oblivion-individual identities/collective identity in the choose of what it will be considered patrimony inside a community. The concept of patrimony have not been the same along the history and its changing meaning have evolve since the idea of an illustrated treasure to the idea of a touristic resource, and rating it as a cultural product and a mechanism of identity construction. The museum is one of the institution in charge of determine and perpetuate what is consider patrimony and what is not. This could represent the past, in a reliable way or not, it could distort it from its selections and classifications, it could restrict the past because of its codes of historic representation, the way in which it tell it story, the way in which the artifacts are presented. The artifacts are gathered and presented to generate a particular sense to the visitor that observes it.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología
publishDate 2010
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5456
work_keys_str_mv AT colasurdomariabelen somethoughtsontheimplicationsofmemoryandidentityintheconstitutionofthepatrimony
AT sartorijulietaisabel somethoughtsontheimplicationsofmemoryandidentityintheconstitutionofthepatrimony
AT escuderosandracristina somethoughtsontheimplicationsofmemoryandidentityintheconstitutionofthepatrimony
AT colasurdomariabelen laimplicanciadelamemoriaylaidentidadenlaconstituciondelpatrimonioalgunasreflexiones
AT sartorijulietaisabel laimplicanciadelamemoriaylaidentidadenlaconstituciondelpatrimonioalgunasreflexiones
AT escuderosandracristina laimplicanciadelamemoriaylaidentidadenlaconstituciondelpatrimonioalgunasreflexiones
first_indexed 2022-08-20T01:11:00Z
last_indexed 2022-08-20T01:11:00Z
_version_ 1770717769929588736