Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony
This paper is about the relation between the concepts of Memory – Identity – Patrimony from an anthropological focus. Since the intrinsic ambiguity of those concepts, it´s considered the preponderant role play by the mechanism of memory/oblivion-individual identities/collective identity in the choos...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo revista |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5456 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I10-R10-article-5456 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
I10-R10-article-54562021-06-18T17:45:56Z Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony La implicancia de la memoria y la identidad en la constitución del patrimonio. Algunas reflexiones Colasurdo, María Belén Sartori, Julieta Isabel Escudero, Sandra Cristina memoria patrimonio identidad museo antropología memory identity patrimony museum anthropology memory identity patrimony museum anthropology This paper is about the relation between the concepts of Memory – Identity – Patrimony from an anthropological focus. Since the intrinsic ambiguity of those concepts, it´s considered the preponderant role play by the mechanism of memory/oblivion-individual identities/collective identity in the choose of what it will be considered patrimony inside a community. The concept of patrimony have not been the same along the history and its changing meaning have evolve since the idea of an illustrated treasure to the idea of a touristic resource, and rating it as a cultural product and a mechanism of identity construction. The museum is one of the institution in charge of determine and perpetuate what is consider patrimony and what is not. This could represent the past, in a reliable way or not, it could distort it from its selections and classifications, it could restrict the past because of its codes of historic representation, the way in which it tell it story, the way in which the artifacts are presented. The artifacts are gathered and presented to generate a particular sense to the visitor that observes it. En el presente trabajo se reflexiona acerca de la relación entre los conceptos de Memoria – Identidad – Patrimonio desde un enfoque antropológico. A partir de la ambigüedad intrínseca que caracteriza a los mismos, se considera el papel preponderante que juegan los mecanismos de memoria/olvido-identidades individuales/identidad colectiva en la elección de lo que será considerado patrimonio dentro de una comunidad. El concepto de patrimonio no ha sido el mismo a lo largo de la historia y su cambiante significado ha transitado, desde la idea inicial de tesoro ilustrado, hasta la de recurso turístico, pasando por su valoración como producto cultural y mecanismo de construcción de identidad. El museo es una de las instituciones que se encargan de determinar y perpetuar qué se considera patrimonio y qué no. El mismo puede representar bien o mal el pasado, puede distorsionarlo a partir de sus selecciones y clasificaciones, puede restringir el pasado a través de su código de representación histórica, la forma en que cuenta su historia, la forma en que son presentados los artefactos. Estos últimos son reunidos y presentados para generar un sentido particular para el visitante que los observa. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología 2010-12-26 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed article Artículo revisado por pares museología antropológica Artigo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5456 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 3 (2010) NÚMERO 1; 149-154 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 3 (2010) NÚMERO 1; 149-154 Revista del Museo de Antropología; Vol 3 (2010) NÚMERO 1; 149-154 1852-4826 1852-060X 10.31048/1852.4826.v3.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5456/5902 Derechos de autor 2010 María Belén Colasurdo, Julieta Isabel Sartori, Sandra Cristina Escudero |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
institution_str |
I-10 |
repository_str |
R-10 |
container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
language |
Español |
format |
Artículo revista |
topic |
memoria patrimonio identidad museo antropología memory identity patrimony museum anthropology memory identity patrimony museum anthropology |
spellingShingle |
memoria patrimonio identidad museo antropología memory identity patrimony museum anthropology memory identity patrimony museum anthropology Colasurdo, María Belén Sartori, Julieta Isabel Escudero, Sandra Cristina Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony |
topic_facet |
memoria patrimonio identidad museo antropología memory identity patrimony museum anthropology memory identity patrimony museum anthropology |
author |
Colasurdo, María Belén Sartori, Julieta Isabel Escudero, Sandra Cristina |
author_facet |
Colasurdo, María Belén Sartori, Julieta Isabel Escudero, Sandra Cristina |
author_sort |
Colasurdo, María Belén |
title |
Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony |
title_short |
Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony |
title_full |
Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony |
title_fullStr |
Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony |
title_full_unstemmed |
Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony |
title_sort |
some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony |
description |
This paper is about the relation between the concepts of Memory – Identity – Patrimony from an anthropological focus. Since the intrinsic ambiguity of those concepts, it´s considered the preponderant role play by the mechanism of memory/oblivion-individual identities/collective identity in the choose of what it will be considered patrimony inside a community. The concept of patrimony have not been the same along the history and its changing meaning have evolve since the idea of an illustrated treasure to the idea of a touristic resource, and rating it as a cultural product and a mechanism of identity construction. The museum is one of the institution in charge of determine and perpetuate what is consider patrimony and what is not. This could represent the past, in a reliable way or not, it could distort it from its selections and classifications, it could restrict the past because of its codes of historic representation, the way in which it tell it story, the way in which the artifacts are presented. The artifacts are gathered and presented to generate a particular sense to the visitor that observes it. |
publisher |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Museo de Antropología |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5456 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT colasurdomariabelen somethoughtsontheimplicationsofmemoryandidentityintheconstitutionofthepatrimony AT sartorijulietaisabel somethoughtsontheimplicationsofmemoryandidentityintheconstitutionofthepatrimony AT escuderosandracristina somethoughtsontheimplicationsofmemoryandidentityintheconstitutionofthepatrimony AT colasurdomariabelen laimplicanciadelamemoriaylaidentidadenlaconstituciondelpatrimonioalgunasreflexiones AT sartorijulietaisabel laimplicanciadelamemoriaylaidentidadenlaconstituciondelpatrimonioalgunasreflexiones AT escuderosandracristina laimplicanciadelamemoriaylaidentidadenlaconstituciondelpatrimonioalgunasreflexiones |
first_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:11:00Z |
last_indexed |
2022-08-20T01:11:00Z |
_version_ |
1770717769929588736 |