Construction and Validation of the School Bullying and Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CACE) through Expert Judgment
The objective of this article is to validate the items of a psychometric test on bullying and cyberbullying through the constitution of an expert panel. A mixed methodology with quantitative predominance was used based on the demonstration of four theoretical criteria (sufficiency, clarity, coherenc...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Psicología. Laboratorio de Evaluación Psicológica y Educativa (LEPE)
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/41014 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R10-article-41014 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R10-article-410142023-04-26T18:27:42Z Construction and Validation of the School Bullying and Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CACE) through Expert Judgment Construcción y validación del Cuestionario de Acoso y Ciberacoso Escolar (CACE) mediante juicio de expertos Expósito, Cristián David Marsollier, Roxana Graciela Difabio, Hilda Emilia Castro Santander, Alejandro instrument validation expert panel bullying cyberbullying validity and reliability research methodology middle education validación de instrumento juicio de expertos bullying ciberbullying validez y confiabilidad metodología de investigación educación secundaria The objective of this article is to validate the items of a psychometric test on bullying and cyberbullying through the constitution of an expert panel. A mixed methodology with quantitative predominance was used based on the demonstration of four theoretical criteria (sufficiency, clarity, coherence and relevance) for each of the items. For the quantitative analysis, we worked with the model of Hyrkäs et al. (2003), Friedman’s statistics, Kendall’s W and Aiken’s V. The qualitative analysis was developed following the methodology of Strauss and Corbin’s Grounded Theory (2016). The results show optimal levels of quality in the specific domain of the variable measured and evaluated. Consequently, they indicate that the instrument submitted for evaluation by a panel of experts presents coherent and adequate psychometric indicators in relation to the variables it intends to investigate. El objetivo del presente artículo es validar los ítems de una prueba psicométrica sobre acoso y ciberacoso a través de la constitución de un tribunal de expertos. Se utilizó una metodología mixta con predominancia cuantitativa basada en la demostración de cuatro criterios teóricos, es decir, suficiencia, claridad, coherencia y relevancia, para cada uno de los ítems. Para el análisis cuantitativo, se trabajó con el modelo de Hyrkäs et al. (2003), los estadísticos de Friedman, la W de Kendall y la V de Aiken. El análisis cualitativo se desarrolló siguiendo la metodología de la Teoría Fundamentada de Strauss y Corbin (2016). Los resultados evidencian óptimos niveles de calidad en el dominio específico de la variable medida y evaluada. En consecuencia, indican que el instrumento sometido a evaluación de jueces expertos presenta indicadores psicométricos coherentes y adecuados en relación con las variables que pretende indagar. Facultad de Psicología. Laboratorio de Evaluación Psicológica y Educativa (LEPE) 2023-04-26 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/41014 Revista Evaluar; Vol. 23 Núm. 1 (2023); 61-79 1667-4545 1515-1867 10.35670/1667-4545.v23.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/41014/41099 Derechos de autor 2023 Cristián David Expósito, Roxana Graciela Marsollier, Hilda Emilia Difabio, Alejandro Castro Santander http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-10 |
| container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
instrument validation expert panel bullying cyberbullying validity and reliability research methodology middle education validación de instrumento juicio de expertos bullying ciberbullying validez y confiabilidad metodología de investigación educación secundaria |
| spellingShingle |
instrument validation expert panel bullying cyberbullying validity and reliability research methodology middle education validación de instrumento juicio de expertos bullying ciberbullying validez y confiabilidad metodología de investigación educación secundaria Expósito, Cristián David Marsollier, Roxana Graciela Difabio, Hilda Emilia Castro Santander, Alejandro Construction and Validation of the School Bullying and Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CACE) through Expert Judgment |
| topic_facet |
instrument validation expert panel bullying cyberbullying validity and reliability research methodology middle education validación de instrumento juicio de expertos bullying ciberbullying validez y confiabilidad metodología de investigación educación secundaria |
| author |
Expósito, Cristián David Marsollier, Roxana Graciela Difabio, Hilda Emilia Castro Santander, Alejandro |
| author_facet |
Expósito, Cristián David Marsollier, Roxana Graciela Difabio, Hilda Emilia Castro Santander, Alejandro |
| author_sort |
Expósito, Cristián David |
| title |
Construction and Validation of the School Bullying and Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CACE) through Expert Judgment |
| title_short |
Construction and Validation of the School Bullying and Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CACE) through Expert Judgment |
| title_full |
Construction and Validation of the School Bullying and Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CACE) through Expert Judgment |
| title_fullStr |
Construction and Validation of the School Bullying and Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CACE) through Expert Judgment |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Construction and Validation of the School Bullying and Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CACE) through Expert Judgment |
| title_sort |
construction and validation of the school bullying and cyberbullying questionnaire (cace) through expert judgment |
| description |
The objective of this article is to validate the items of a psychometric test on bullying and cyberbullying through the constitution of an expert panel. A mixed methodology with quantitative predominance was used based on the demonstration of four theoretical criteria (sufficiency, clarity, coherence and relevance) for each of the items. For the quantitative analysis, we worked with the model of Hyrkäs et al. (2003), Friedman’s statistics, Kendall’s W and Aiken’s V. The qualitative analysis was developed following the methodology of Strauss and Corbin’s Grounded Theory (2016). The results show optimal levels of quality in the specific domain of the variable measured and evaluated. Consequently, they indicate that the instrument submitted for evaluation by a panel of experts presents coherent and adequate psychometric indicators in relation to the variables it intends to investigate. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Psicología. Laboratorio de Evaluación Psicológica y Educativa (LEPE) |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/41014 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT expositocristiandavid constructionandvalidationoftheschoolbullyingandcyberbullyingquestionnairecacethroughexpertjudgment AT marsollierroxanagraciela constructionandvalidationoftheschoolbullyingandcyberbullyingquestionnairecacethroughexpertjudgment AT difabiohildaemilia constructionandvalidationoftheschoolbullyingandcyberbullyingquestionnairecacethroughexpertjudgment AT castrosantanderalejandro constructionandvalidationoftheschoolbullyingandcyberbullyingquestionnairecacethroughexpertjudgment AT expositocristiandavid construccionyvalidaciondelcuestionariodeacosoyciberacosoescolarcacemediantejuiciodeexpertos AT marsollierroxanagraciela construccionyvalidaciondelcuestionariodeacosoyciberacosoescolarcacemediantejuiciodeexpertos AT difabiohildaemilia construccionyvalidaciondelcuestionariodeacosoyciberacosoescolarcacemediantejuiciodeexpertos AT castrosantanderalejandro construccionyvalidaciondelcuestionariodeacosoyciberacosoescolarcacemediantejuiciodeexpertos |
| first_indexed |
2023-05-25T23:29:24Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-05-25T23:29:24Z |
| _version_ |
1770716402229968896 |