Effect of Adara-M2624 and other seven rootstocks on fruit damages and defects of two sweet cherry varieties

Rootstocks modify tree performance by adapting to different soil and climatic conditions. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design, with six replications. The percentage of damage was measured by the following components: cracked fruit, stemless fruit and mechanical damage. The...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tersoglio, Eduardo, Setien, Nancy
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. 2022
Materias:
sweet cherry, rootstock, loss, damage, defect, cracked fruit, deep suture
cerezo
fruto partido
daños mecánicos}
sutura profunda
espolón
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/agris/article/view/117-132
Aporte de:
Revistas de la UNC de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R10-article-28816
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R10-article-288162023-04-27T14:59:52Z Effect of Adara-M2624 and other seven rootstocks on fruit damages and defects of two sweet cherry varieties Efecto de Adara-M2624 y otros siete portainjertos sobre daños y defectos de frutos de dos variedades de cereza (Prunus avium L.) Tersoglio, Eduardo Setien, Nancy sweet cherry, rootstock, loss, damage, defect, cracked fruit, deep suture cerezo fruto partido daños mecánicos} sutura profunda espolón Rootstocks modify tree performance by adapting to different soil and climatic conditions. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design, with six replications. The percentage of damage was measured by the following components: cracked fruit, stemless fruit and mechanical damage. The percentage of defect was measured by the following components: spur fruit, double fruit and deep suture. The addition of damage and defect constituted the total loss. Climatic conditions, variety and rootstock influenced all variables. Rootstocks influenced the losses of Bing and Celeste varieties. The rootstocks that recorded the lowest loss and simultaneously, the lowest damage and defect were SL 64, MxM 60 and Weiroot 13, whereas CAB6P and Adara-Mariana 2624 reduced defects but increased damage. Both GiSeLa®5 and GiSeLa®6 reduced damage, although GiSeLa®5 increased defects. Rootstocks SL 64, MxM 60, Weirrot 13 and GiSeLa®6 reduced cracking, mechanical damage and suture; CAB6P and Adara-Mariana 2624 reduced suture and spur but increased cracking and mechanical damage; GiSeLa®5 reduced all three types of damage and increased all types of defects. Proper rootstock selection reduces losses. Los portainjertos modifican el desempeño del árbol, adaptándose a diferentes condiciones edafo-climáticas. El diseño experimental fue de bloques completos al azar, con seis repeticiones. El porcentaje de daño se midió a través de los siguientes componentes: fruto partido, ausencia de pedúnculo y daño mecánico. El porcentaje de defecto se midió con los siguientes componentes: fruto con espolón, frutos dobles y sutura profunda. La adición de daño y de defecto constituyó la pérdida total. Las condiciones climáticas, variedad y portainjerto influyeron sobre todas las variables. Los portainjertos influyen sobre las pérdidas de variedad Bing y Celeste. Los portainjertos que registraron la menor pérdida y, simultáneamente, el menor daño y defecto fueron SL 64, MxM 60 y Weiroot 13; mientras que CAB6P y Adara-Mariana 2624 redujeron los defectos, pero incrementaron los daños. Tanto GiSeLa®5 como GiSeLa®6 redujeron los daños, aunque GiSeLa®5 incrementó los defectos. Los portainjertos SL 64, MxM 60, Weirrot 13 y GiSeLa®6 redujeron agrietado, daño mecánico y sutura; CAB6P y Adara-Mariana 2624 redujeron sutura y espolón, pero incrementaron agrietado y daño mecánico; GiSeLa®5 redujo los tres tipos de daños e incrementó todos los tipos de defectos. Una adecuada selección del portainjerto disminuye pérdidas. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. 2022-06-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/agris/article/view/117-132 AgriScientia; Vol. 39 No. 1 (2022) AgriScientia; Vol. 39 Núm. 1 (2022) 1668-298X 10.31047/1668.298x.v39.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/agris/article/view/117-132/38052 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/agris/article/view/117-132/41127 Derechos de autor 2022 Eduardo Tersoglio, Nancy Setien https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic sweet cherry, rootstock, loss, damage, defect, cracked fruit, deep suture
cerezo
fruto partido
daños mecánicos}
sutura profunda
espolón
spellingShingle sweet cherry, rootstock, loss, damage, defect, cracked fruit, deep suture
cerezo
fruto partido
daños mecánicos}
sutura profunda
espolón
Tersoglio, Eduardo
Setien, Nancy
Effect of Adara-M2624 and other seven rootstocks on fruit damages and defects of two sweet cherry varieties
topic_facet sweet cherry, rootstock, loss, damage, defect, cracked fruit, deep suture
cerezo
fruto partido
daños mecánicos}
sutura profunda
espolón
author Tersoglio, Eduardo
Setien, Nancy
author_facet Tersoglio, Eduardo
Setien, Nancy
author_sort Tersoglio, Eduardo
title Effect of Adara-M2624 and other seven rootstocks on fruit damages and defects of two sweet cherry varieties
title_short Effect of Adara-M2624 and other seven rootstocks on fruit damages and defects of two sweet cherry varieties
title_full Effect of Adara-M2624 and other seven rootstocks on fruit damages and defects of two sweet cherry varieties
title_fullStr Effect of Adara-M2624 and other seven rootstocks on fruit damages and defects of two sweet cherry varieties
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Adara-M2624 and other seven rootstocks on fruit damages and defects of two sweet cherry varieties
title_sort effect of adara-m2624 and other seven rootstocks on fruit damages and defects of two sweet cherry varieties
description Rootstocks modify tree performance by adapting to different soil and climatic conditions. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design, with six replications. The percentage of damage was measured by the following components: cracked fruit, stemless fruit and mechanical damage. The percentage of defect was measured by the following components: spur fruit, double fruit and deep suture. The addition of damage and defect constituted the total loss. Climatic conditions, variety and rootstock influenced all variables. Rootstocks influenced the losses of Bing and Celeste varieties. The rootstocks that recorded the lowest loss and simultaneously, the lowest damage and defect were SL 64, MxM 60 and Weiroot 13, whereas CAB6P and Adara-Mariana 2624 reduced defects but increased damage. Both GiSeLa®5 and GiSeLa®6 reduced damage, although GiSeLa®5 increased defects. Rootstocks SL 64, MxM 60, Weirrot 13 and GiSeLa®6 reduced cracking, mechanical damage and suture; CAB6P and Adara-Mariana 2624 reduced suture and spur but increased cracking and mechanical damage; GiSeLa®5 reduced all three types of damage and increased all types of defects. Proper rootstock selection reduces losses.
publisher Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias.
publishDate 2022
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/agris/article/view/117-132
work_keys_str_mv AT tersoglioeduardo effectofadaram2624andothersevenrootstocksonfruitdamagesanddefectsoftwosweetcherryvarieties
AT setiennancy effectofadaram2624andothersevenrootstocksonfruitdamagesanddefectsoftwosweetcherryvarieties
AT tersoglioeduardo efectodeadaram2624yotrossieteportainjertossobredanosydefectosdefrutosdedosvariedadesdecerezaprunusaviuml
AT setiennancy efectodeadaram2624yotrossieteportainjertossobredanosydefectosdefrutosdedosvariedadesdecerezaprunusaviuml
first_indexed 2022-08-20T01:01:45Z
last_indexed 2023-05-25T23:38:39Z
_version_ 1770717058791636992

Ejemplares similares