|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02433cam a22003494a 4500 |
| 001 |
99881733404151 |
| 005 |
20241030105335.0 |
| 008 |
990622s1999 enk b 001 0 eng |
| 010 |
|
|
|a 99036964
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0198290845
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780198290841
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)41628234
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)ocm41628234
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DLC
|c DLC
|d UKM
|d OCLCQ
|d U@S
|
| 042 |
|
|
|a pcc
|
| 043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a U@SA
|
| 050 |
0 |
0 |
|a JC423
|b .H345 1999
|
| 080 |
|
|
|a 320.51
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Hardin, Russell,
|d 1940-
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Liberalism, constitutionalism, and democracy /
|c Russell Hardin.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Oxford ;
|a New York :
|b Oxford University Press,
|c 1999.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a xviii, 379 p. ;
|c 23 cm.
|
| 504 |
|
|
|a Incluye referencias bibliográficas (p. 333-347) e índice.
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a 1. Mutual advantage -- 2. Liberalism: political and economic -- 3. Constitutionalism: contract or coordination? -- 4. Democracy: agreement or acquiescence? -- 5. Liberalization and its discontents -- 6. Constitutional economic transition -- 7. Democracy on the margin -- Afterword: whether agreed to or not.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a "The central argument of this book is that liberalism, constitutionalism, and democracy, as well as, specifically, liberal constitutional democracy all work, when they do, because they serve the mutual advantage of the politically effective groups in the society through coordination of those groups on a political and, perhaps, economic order. These arguments are applied both to the early history of constitutional developments in the United States and to contemporary transitions from autocratic regimes to market democracies. A subsidiary claim is that constitutional political institutions and democratic procedures generally require not so much active support as merely acquiescence in order to survive and work. These are explanatory theses, not normative claims, but they have relevance for normative claims if one takes seriously some relative of Kant's dictum that ought implies can. If we are to insist that some form of government is normatively right for a particular society, we must be able to say that it would or could work for that society." --Descripción del editor.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Democracy.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Liberalism.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Constitutional history
|z United States.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Democracia.
|2 UDESA
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Liberalismo.
|2 UDESA
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Historia constitucional
|z Estados Unidos.
|2 UDESA
|