The virtues of mendacity : on lying in politics /

When Michael Dukakis accused George H. W. Bush of being the "Joe Isuzu of American Politics" during the 1988 presidential campaign, he asserted in a particularly American tenor the near-ancient idea that lying and politics (and perhaps advertising, too) are inseparable, or at least intertw...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jay, Martin, 1944-
Formato: Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Charlottesville ; London : University of Virginia Press, 2012, c2010.
Edición:1st paperback ed.
Colección:Richard lectures ; 2008.
Materias:
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 02568cam a2200361Ia 4500
001 990000599430204151
005 20180327175052.0
008 120303r20122010vau b s001 0 eng
020 |a 9780813932460 
020 |a 0813932467 
035 |a (OCoLC)000059943 
035 |a (udesa)000059943USA01 
035 |a (OCoLC)778971953 
035 |a (OCoLC)990000599430204151 
040 |a VA@  |c VA@  |d BDX  |d BTCTA  |d YDXCP  |d U@S 
049 |a U@SA 
050 4 |a BJ1421  |b .J39 2012 
100 1 |a Jay, Martin,  |d 1944- 
245 1 4 |a The virtues of mendacity :  |b on lying in politics /  |c Martin Jay. 
250 |a 1st paperback ed. 
260 |a Charlottesville ;  |a London :  |b University of Virginia Press,  |c 2012, c2010. 
300 |a xv, 241, [4] p. ;  |c 21 cm. 
490 1 |a Richard lectures for 2008 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Introduction: American democracy and the dream of transparent politics -- On lying -- On the political -- On lying in politics. 
520 |a When Michael Dukakis accused George H. W. Bush of being the "Joe Isuzu of American Politics" during the 1988 presidential campaign, he asserted in a particularly American tenor the near-ancient idea that lying and politics (and perhaps advertising, too) are inseparable, or at least intertwined. Our response to this phenomenon, writes the renowned intellectual historian Martin Jay, tends to vacillate, often impotently, between moral outrage and amoral realism. In The Virtues of Mendacity, Jay resolves to avoid this conventional framing of the debate over lying and politics by examining what has been said in support of, and opposition to, political lying from Plato and St. Augustine to Hannah Arendt and Leo Strauss. Jay proceeds to show that each philosopher's argument corresponds to a particular conception of the political realm, which decisively shapes his or her attitude toward political mendacity. He then applies this insight to a variety of contexts and questions about lying and politics. Surprisingly, he concludes by asking if lying in politics is really all that bad. The political hypocrisy that Americans in particular periodically decry may be, in Jay's view, the best alternative to the violence justified by those who claim to know the truth. 
650 0 |a Truthfulness and falsehood. 
650 0 |a Political ethics. 
650 0 |a Political science  |x Philosophy. 
650 7 |a Verdad y mentira.  |2 UDESA 
650 7 |a Ética política.  |2 UDESA 
650 7 |a Ciencias políticas  |x Filosofía.  |2 UDESA 
830 0 |a Richard lectures ;  |v 2008.