Expert political judgment : how good is it? how can we know? /

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tetlock, Philip
Formato: Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c2005.
Materias:
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 01586cam-a22003374a-4500
001 990000455640204151
005 20180214134401.0
008 041012s2005----njua-----b----001-0-eng--
010 |a 2004061694 
015 |a GBA535963  |2 bnb 
016 7 |a 013185190  |2 Uk 
020 |a 0691123020 (alk. paper) 
024 3 |a 9780691123028 
029 1 |a NLGGC  |b 269164251 
035 |a (OCoLC)000045564 
035 |a (udesa)000045564USA01 
035 |a (OCoLC)56825108 
035 |a (OCoLC)990000455640204151 
040 |a DLC  |c DLC  |d YDX  |d UKM  |d BAKER  |d IXA  |d YBM  |d NLGGC  |d TTU  |d U@S 
042 |a pcc 
049 |a U@SA 
050 0 0 |a JA74.5  |b .T38 2005 
082 0 0 |a 320/.01/9  |2 22 
100 1 |a Tetlock, Philip. 
245 1 0 |a Expert political judgment :  |b how good is it? how can we know? /  |c Philip E. Tetlock. 
260 |a Princeton, N.J. :  |b Princeton University Press,  |c c2005. 
300 |a xvi, 321 p. :  |b ill. ;  |c 24 cm. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Quantifying the unquantifiable -- The ego-deflating challenge of radical skepticism -- Knowing the limits of one's knowledge: foxes have better calibration and discrimination scores than hedgehogs -- Honoring reputational bets: foxes are better Bayesians than hedgehogs -- Contemplating counterfactuals: foxes are more willing than hedgehogs to entertain self-subversive scenarios -- The hedgehogs strike back -- Are we open-minded enough to acknowledge the limits of open-mindedness? -- Exploring the limits on objectivity and accountability. 
650 0 |a Political psychology. 
650 0 |a Ideology.