Providing heat - stress abatement to late - lactation Holstein cows affects hormones, metabolite blood profiles, and hepatic gene expression but not productive responses

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the effects of providing shade and shade combined with evaporative cooling on production, cow activity, metabolism, and hepatic gene expression of late-lactation Holstein dairy cows under moderate heat-stress conditions. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Martínez, Rocío Soledad, Palladino, Rafael Alejandro, Banchero, Georgget, Fernández Martín, Rafael, Nanni, Mariana, Juliano, Nicolás, Iorio, Jesica, La Manna, Alejandro
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2021martinez.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 04412cab a22003977a 4500
001 20220929165733.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20230405115334.0
008 220929t2021 ne d||||o|||| 00| 0 eng d
999 |c 55009  |d 55009 
999 |d 55009 
999 |d 55009 
999 |d 55009 
022 |a 2590-2865 
024 |a 10.15232/aas.2020-02109 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 |a Providing heat - stress abatement to late - lactation Holstein cows affects hormones, metabolite blood profiles, and hepatic gene expression but not productive responses 
520 |a Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the effects of providing shade and shade combined with evaporative cooling on production, cow activity, metabolism, and hepatic gene expression of late-lactation Holstein dairy cows under moderate heat-stress conditions. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight multiparous Holstein cows were used in a completely randomized blockdesign trial and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: control (CTL), without access to shade; access to artificial shade (SH); and shade combined with evaporative cooling (SHplus). Results were analyzed using a mixed procedure with repeated measures. Results and Discussion: No differences were observed in DMI. Milk yield was not different among treatments, but lactose concentration was greater in SHplus. Treatments CTL and SH had greater BW losses than SHplus. Control cows spent less time grazing. The CTL and SH had higher p.m. rectal temperatures than SHplus, whereas CTL had the highest p.m. respiration rate. Control cows had greater serum insulin levels. Control and SH had greater BHB and urea concentrations and lower glucose concentration compared with SHplus. The hepatic expression of PCK1, PDK4, and HP genes was downregulated in SH and SHplus relative to control. Hepatic expression of NFKB1 was downregulated, whereas SOCS2 was pregulated, for SHplus compared with CTL. Implications and Applications: Despite the absence of treatment effects on productive variables, changes in blood profiles and hepatic expression of target genes were observed among treatments. These results suggest that the provision of shade combined with evaporative cooling was effective in alleviating the negative effects of heat stress. 
653 |a HEAT STRESS 
653 |a LATE LACTATION 
653 |a ENERGY METABOLISM 
653 |a HEPATIC GENE EXPRESSION 
700 1 |a Martínez, Rocío Soledad  |u Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). Colonia, Uruguay.  |9 31075 
700 1 |a Palladino, Rafael Alejandro  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Animal (INPA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Animal (INPA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 51111 
700 1 |a Banchero, Georgget  |u Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). Colonia, Uruguay.  |9 74086 
700 1 |a Fernández Martín, Rafael  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Animal (INPA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Animal (INPA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 33720 
700 1 |a Nanni, Mariana  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Tecnología de Alimentos. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 74087 
700 1 |a Juliano, Nicolás  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 34735 
700 1 |a Iorio, Jesica  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 74088 
700 1 |a La Manna, Alejandro  |u Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). Colonia, Uruguay.  |9 44749 
773 |t Applied Animal Science  |g Vol.37, no.4, p.490-503, grafs., tbls. 
856 |f 2021martinez  |i en internet  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2021martinez.pdf  |x ARTI202210 
856 |u http://appliedanimalscience.org/  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
942 |c ARTICULO  |n 1 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG