Unicellular microalgae vs. filamentous algae for wastewater treatment and nutrient recovery
Microalgae-based wastewater treatment is a promising platform since it enables nutrient recovery. The use of filamentous algae could improve this technology by reducing harvesting cost and enhancing biomass management. The potential of 12 nicellular and 12 filamentous algae strains was evaluated f...
Guardado en:
| Otros Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2021rearte1.pdf LINK AL EDITOR |
| Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
| LEADER | 03098cab a22003617a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 20220916154212.0 | ||
| 003 | AR-BaUFA | ||
| 005 | 20230330144202.0 | ||
| 008 | 220916t2021 ne do|||o|||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 999 | |c 54972 |d 54972 | ||
| 999 | |d 54972 | ||
| 999 | |d 54972 | ||
| 022 | |a 2211-9264 | ||
| 024 | |a 10.1016/j.algal.2021.102442 | ||
| 040 | |a AR-BaUFA |c AR-BaUFA | ||
| 245 | 1 | |a Unicellular microalgae vs. filamentous algae for wastewater treatment and nutrient recovery | |
| 520 | |a Microalgae-based wastewater treatment is a promising platform since it enables nutrient recovery. The use of filamentous algae could improve this technology by reducing harvesting cost and enhancing biomass management. The potential of 12 nicellular and 12 filamentous algae strains was evaluated for the treatment and nutrient recovery of a raw wastewater from a slaughterhouse (RWS). Chlorococcum sp. FAUBA-42 unicellular) and Stigeoclonium sp. FAUBA-10 (filamentous) were selected due to their biomass production using RWS as the sole nutrient source. Comprehensive analysis of batch and semicontinuous regime was carried out for both strains. Semicontinuous cultures showed three times higher biomass productivity than batch regime. The highest biomass productivity (0.45 g DW L− 1 d− 1 ) and photosynthetic quantum yield (1.6 g DW mol photons− 1 ) was reached by the filamentous strain Stigeoclonium FAUBA-10 under 2.5 d HRT. Both strains showed nutrient removal above 92% under 5 d and 2.5 d HRT. Biomass of Stigeoclonium FAUBA-10 can be easily harvested by filtration through mesh screens (<341 μm) which is an operational benefit. | ||
| 650 | |2 Agrovoc |9 26 | ||
| 653 | |a WASTEWATE | ||
| 653 | |a FILAMENTOUS ALGAE | ||
| 653 | |a PHOTOSYNTHESIS PERFORMANCE | ||
| 653 | |a BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY | ||
| 653 | |a HARVEST | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Rearte, Tomás Agustín |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Química Inorgánica y Analítica. Buenos Aires, Argentina. |u CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina. |9 31229 | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 69257 |a Rodríguez, Natalia |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Química Inorgánica y Analítica. Buenos Aires, Argentina. |u CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sabatte, Felipe |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Química Inorgánica y Analítica. Buenos Aires, Argentina. |9 72271 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fabrizio de Iorio, Alicia Rosa |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Cátedra de Química Inorgánica y Analítica. Buenos Aires, Argentina. |9 9199 | |
| 773 | |t Algal Research |g Vol.59 (2021), e102442, 11 p., grafs., tbls., fot. | ||
| 856 | |f 2021rearte1 |i en reservorio |q application/pdf |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2021rearte1.pdf |x ARTI202210 | ||
| 856 | |u http://www.elsevier.com |z LINK AL EDITOR | ||
| 942 | |c ARTICULO |n 1 | ||
| 942 | |c ENLINEA | ||
| 976 | |a AAG | ||