Different soybean cultivars respond differentially to damage in a herbivore ‑ specific manner and decreas herbivore performance

This study demonstrates that soybean cultivars respond differentially to damage in a herbivore-specific manner, and trigger responses decreasing herbivore performance. Soybean crops are affected by a great number of insect herbivores, resulting in devastating yield losses. Secondary metabolites like...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Romero, Berenice
Otros Autores: Dillon, Francisco María, Zavala, Jorge Alberto
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2020romero.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 04324nab a22003977a 4500
001 20200522104841.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220811142016.0
008 200522t2020 gw d||||o|||| 00| | eng d
999 |c 47986  |d 47986 
999 |d 47986 
999 |d 47986 
999 |d 47986 
999 |d 47986 
022 |a 1872-8847 
024 |a 10.1007/s11829-019-09730-y 
040 |a AR-BaUFA 
100 1 |9 71031  |a Romero, Berenice  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Biología Aplicada y Alimentos. Cátedra de Bioquímica. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
245 0 0 |a Different soybean cultivars respond differentially to damage in a herbivore ‑ specific manner and decreas herbivore performance 
520 |a This study demonstrates that soybean cultivars respond differentially to damage in a herbivore-specific manner, and trigger responses decreasing herbivore performance. Soybean crops are affected by a great number of insect herbivores, resulting in devastating yield losses. Secondary metabolites like proteinase inhibitors and phenolic compounds are part of plants’ defense mechanisms against insect pests. However, the specificity of soybean defense responses to different attacking herbivores is poorly known. To investigate species-specific foliage responses to herbivory, we used two different commercial soybean cultivars (DM 4210 and DM 5.8i) widely used in Argentina with diverse susceptibility to insects’ attack and two species of phytophagous insects, thrips (Caliothrips phaseoli; Thysanoptera) and lepidopteran larvae (Spodoptera frugiperda; Lepidoptera) with a different way of feeding. Benzoic acid derivative levels were increased by damage of both insect species in the foliage of the field-grown soybean cultivars, whereas trypsin protease inhibitors activity was induced in cultivar (cv) DM 4210 by fall armyworm damage and malonyl genistein content in cv DM 5.8i after thrips’ attack. Although survivorship and mass of fall armyworm larvae were not differentially affected in field conditions by soybean cultivars, larvae reared in the laboratory that fed on cv DM 5.8i gained more mass than those on DM 4210. Conversely, thrips performance, natural colonization, and preference of feeding were higher on cv DM 4210 than on cv DM 5.8i. The differential effects of soybean cultivars on insectspecies’ performance were explained not only by induced defenses, but also by differences of constitutive defenses between cultivars. This study demonstrated that soybean cultivars responded differentially to damage in a herbivorespecific manner, and triggered responses decreased herbivore performance. 
653 |a PLANT 
653 |a INSECT INTERACTIONS 
653 |a GLYCINE MAX LEGUMINOSAE 
653 |a SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA LARVAE 
653 |a THRIPS 
653 |a PROTEINASE 
653 |a INHIBITORS 
653 |a PHENOLICS 
700 1 |a Dillon, Francisco María  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Biología Aplicada y Alimentos. Cátedra de Bioquímica. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |9 33213 
700 1 |9 7916  |a Zavala, Jorge Alberto  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Biología Aplicada y Alimentos. Cátedra de Bioquímica. Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biociencias Agrícolas y Ambientales (INBA). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
773 0 |t Arthropod - Plant Interactions  |g vol.14 (2020), p.89–99, grafs. 
856 |f 2020romero  |i en reservorio  |x ARTI202003  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2020romero.pdf 
856 |z LINK AL EDITOR  |u http://www.springer.com/ 
942 |c ARTICULO 
942 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG