Effect of crop sequences on soil properties and runoff on natural - rainfall erosion plots under no tillage

The objectives of this work were: [i] to assess the effect of different crop sequences under NT in natural-rainfall erosion plots on different soil properties and runoff, taking as extreme and contrasting references a 10-year pasture and a tilled plot without vegetation, [ii] to analyze the effect o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sasal, María Carolina
Otros Autores: Castiglioni, Mario Guillermo, Wilson, Marcelo Germán
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2010Sasal.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 10791cab a22017657a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000405
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220318142025.0
008 181208t2010 |||||o|||||00||||eng d
999 |c 46839  |d 46839 
022 |a 0167-1987 
024 |a 10.1016/j.still.2010.03.010 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
100 1 |9 34064  |a Sasal, María Carolina 
245 0 0 |a Effect of crop sequences on soil properties and runoff on natural - rainfall erosion plots under no tillage 
520 |a The objectives of this work were: [i] to assess the effect of different crop sequences under NT in natural-rainfall erosion plots on different soil properties and runoff, taking as extreme and contrasting references a 10-year pasture and a tilled plot without vegetation, [ii] to analyze the effect on runoff of different categories by volume of rainfalls and [iii] to evaluate the relationship between the intensification of the crop sequence and runoff. The study was carried out between July 2006 and June 2007 [1574mm of rainfall and 25 runoff events] on six natural-rainfall runoff plots with 3.5 percent slope and Aquic Argiudoll [Luvic Phaeozem] soil. The treatments were: corn [C] and soybean [S] monocultures, wheat/soybean [W/S] and the W/S phase of a wheat/soybean-corn rotation [W/S-C], pasture [P], and tilled soil without vegetation [L]. Surface saturated hydraulic conductivity [Khc] was determined with disk permeameters. Saturated hydraulic conductivity [Kh], bulk density [BD], and pore-size distribution were measured in undisturbed soil cores from 0-0.04 and 0.04-0.08m soil layers. Cumulative and average runoff and the average runoff coefficient were analyzed while rainfalls were categorized by the magnitude of the rain event. An intensification sequence index [ISI] was calculated as the ratio between the number of months occupied by crops and the total number of months of the year. Surface Kh under field and laboratory conditions [0-0.04m] was higher in P than in the other treatments [3.3- and 9-fold, respectively] and was similar between crop sequences. Cropping increased BD 26 percent as compared to P and L. In both layers, BD was negatively associated with Kh and macroporosity, and showed no relation with micro- and mesoporosity. All cropping sequences had reduced macroporosity compared to P, without differences between them. L and S had a higher runoff coefficient than P [6.25-fold], W/S-C and W/S, while C showed an intermediate behavior. Treatments had different runoff coefficients during intermediate and small rainfalls, but not with more than 70mm rainfalls. Independently of the rainfall category, S had runoff coefficients similar to those of L, whereas P and crop rotations showed similar losses. Neither the physical nor the hydrological soil properties studied explained the variation in cumulative and average runoff coefficients or those obtained with different rainfall categories. The ISI allowed us to explain cumulative runoff variation, average runoff and average coefficient runoff [R2=0.9]. Water loss through runoff in our type of soil and climate conditions is more associated with the management of surface cover, mainly the number of month of the year occupied by crops, than with an improvement in the physical properties related to porosity and internal soil water movement. 
653 0 |a NATURAL-RAINFALL EROSION PLOTS 
653 0 |a RUNOFF 
653 0 |a SOIL PROPERTIES 
653 0 |a BULK DENSITY 
653 0 |a CLIMATE CONDITION 
653 0 |a CROP ROTATION 
653 0 |a CROP SEQUENCES 
653 0 |a CROPPING SEQUENCES 
653 0 |a LABORATORY CONDITIONS 
653 0 |a MACRO-POROSITY 
653 0 |a MESOPOROSITY 
653 0 |a NO TILLAGE 
653 0 |a NO-TILL 
653 0 |a PERMEAMETERS 
653 0 |a RAIN EVENTS 
653 0 |a RAINFALL EROSION 
653 0 |a RAINFALL RUNOFF 
653 0 |a RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS 
653 0 |a SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY 
653 0 |a SOIL LAYER 
653 0 |a SOIL PROPERTY 
653 0 |a SOIL WATER MOVEMENT 
653 0 |a SURFACE COVER 
653 0 |a TILLED SOILS 
653 0 |a UNDISTURBED SOILS 
653 0 |a WATER LOSS 
653 0 |a CROPS 
653 0 |a HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY 
653 0 |a PORE SIZE 
653 0 |a ROTATION 
653 0 |a SOIL MOISTURE 
653 0 |a UNDERWATER SOILS 
653 0 |a VEGETATION 
653 0 |a RAIN 
653 0 |a BULK DENSITY 
653 0 |a CROP ROTATION 
653 0 |a HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY 
653 0 |a POROSITY 
653 0 |a RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING 
653 0 |a SOIL EROSION 
653 0 |a ZERO TILLAGE 
653 0 |a GLYCINE MAX 
653 0 |a ZEA MAYS 
700 1 |9 3430  |a Castiglioni, Mario Guillermo 
700 1 |a Wilson, Marcelo Germán  |9 48417 
773 |t Soil and Tillage Research  |g Vol.108, no.1-2 (2010), p.24-29 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2010Sasal.pdf  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |f 2010Sasal  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u http://www.elsevier.com/  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
900 |a as 
900 |a 20131220 
900 |a N 
900 |a SCOPUS 
900 |a a 
900 |a s 
900 |a ARTICULO 
900 |a EN LINEA 
900 |a 01671987 
900 |a 10.1016/j.still.2010.03.010 
900 |a ^tEffect of crop sequences on soil properties and runoff on natural-rainfall erosion plots under no tillage 
900 |a ^aSasal^bM.C. 
900 |a ^aCastiglioni^bM.G. 
900 |a ^aWilson^bM.G. 
900 |a ^aSasal^bM. C. 
900 |a ^aCastiglioni^bM. G. 
900 |a ^aWilson^bM. G. 
900 |a ^aSasal^bM.C.^tINTA, EEA Paraná, Ruta 11, Km 12.5, 3100 Paraná-Entre Ríos, Argentina 
900 |a ^aCastiglioni^bM.G.^tUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Av. San Martín 4453, 1417 Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aWilson^bM.G. 
900 |a ^tSoil and Tillage Research^cSoil Tillage Res. 
900 |a en 
900 |a 24 
900 |a ^i 
900 |a Vol. 108, no. 1-2 
900 |a 29 
900 |a NATURAL-RAINFALL EROSION PLOTS 
900 |a RUNOFF 
900 |a SOIL PROPERTIES 
900 |a BULK DENSITY 
900 |a CLIMATE CONDITION 
900 |a CROP ROTATION 
900 |a CROP SEQUENCES 
900 |a CROPPING SEQUENCES 
900 |a LABORATORY CONDITIONS 
900 |a MACRO-POROSITY 
900 |a MESOPOROSITY 
900 |a NO TILLAGE 
900 |a NO-TILL 
900 |a PERMEAMETERS 
900 |a RAIN EVENTS 
900 |a RAINFALL EROSION 
900 |a RAINFALL RUNOFF 
900 |a RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS 
900 |a SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY 
900 |a SOIL LAYER 
900 |a SOIL PROPERTY 
900 |a SOIL WATER MOVEMENT 
900 |a SURFACE COVER 
900 |a TILLED SOILS 
900 |a UNDISTURBED SOILS 
900 |a WATER LOSS 
900 |a CROPS 
900 |a HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY 
900 |a PORE SIZE 
900 |a ROTATION 
900 |a SOIL MOISTURE 
900 |a UNDERWATER SOILS 
900 |a VEGETATION 
900 |a RAIN 
900 |a BULK DENSITY 
900 |a CROP ROTATION 
900 |a HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY 
900 |a POROSITY 
900 |a RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING 
900 |a SOIL EROSION 
900 |a ZERO TILLAGE 
900 |a GLYCINE MAX 
900 |a ZEA MAYS 
900 |a The objectives of this work were: [i] to assess the effect of different crop sequences under NT in natural-rainfall erosion plots on different soil properties and runoff, taking as extreme and contrasting references a 10-year pasture and a tilled plot without vegetation, [ii] to analyze the effect on runoff of different categories by volume of rainfalls and [iii] to evaluate the relationship between the intensification of the crop sequence and runoff. The study was carried out between July 2006 and June 2007 [1574mm of rainfall and 25 runoff events] on six natural-rainfall runoff plots with 3.5 percent slope and Aquic Argiudoll [Luvic Phaeozem] soil. The treatments were: corn [C] and soybean [S] monocultures, wheat/soybean [W/S] and the W/S phase of a wheat/soybean-corn rotation [W/S-C], pasture [P], and tilled soil without vegetation [L]. Surface saturated hydraulic conductivity [Khc] was determined with disk permeameters. Saturated hydraulic conductivity [Kh], bulk density [BD], and pore-size distribution were measured in undisturbed soil cores from 0-0.04 and 0.04-0.08m soil layers. Cumulative and average runoff and the average runoff coefficient were analyzed while rainfalls were categorized by the magnitude of the rain event. An intensification sequence index [ISI] was calculated as the ratio between the number of months occupied by crops and the total number of months of the year. Surface Kh under field and laboratory conditions [0-0.04m] was higher in P than in the other treatments [3.3- and 9-fold, respectively] and was similar between crop sequences. Cropping increased BD 26 percent as compared to P and L. In both layers, BD was negatively associated with Kh and macroporosity, and showed no relation with micro- and mesoporosity. All cropping sequences had reduced macroporosity compared to P, without differences between them. L and S had a higher runoff coefficient than P [6.25-fold], W/S-C and W/S, while C showed an intermediate behavior. Treatments had different runoff coefficients during intermediate and small rainfalls, but not with more than 70mm rainfalls. Independently of the rainfall category, S had runoff coefficients similar to those of L, whereas P and crop rotations showed similar losses. Neither the physical nor the hydrological soil properties studied explained the variation in cumulative and average runoff coefficients or those obtained with different rainfall categories. The ISI allowed us to explain cumulative runoff variation, average runoff and average coefficient runoff [R2=0.9]. Water loss through runoff in our type of soil and climate conditions is more associated with the management of surface cover, mainly the number of month of the year occupied by crops, than with an improvement in the physical properties related to porosity and internal soil water movement. 
900 |a 108 
900 |a 1-2 
900 |a 2010 
900 |a ^cH 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a AGROVOC 
900 |a 2010Sasal 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2010Sasal.pdf 
900 |a 2010Sasal.pdf 
900 |a http://www.elsevier.com/ 
900 |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77954863170&partnerID=40&md5=85b469b5acd2db762d468a259552b768 
900 |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i 
900 |a OS 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO  |2 udc 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA  |2 udc