Arthropod communities related to different mixtures of oil [Glycine max L. Merr.] and essential oil [Artemisia annua L.] crops

Plants can host many herbivores and their natural enemies during their growth cycles. For this reason, changes in the relative abundance of crop and weed plants in a monocropping system as well as different crop plants in an intercropping system may produce great bottom up impacts in the specific an...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Lenardis, Adriana Ester, Morvillo, Claudia Mariela, Gil, Alejandra, De la Fuente, Elba Beatriz
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Lenardis.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 11711cab a22022217a 4500
001 AR-BaUFA000347
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20220804121456.0
008 181208t2011 |||||o|||||00||||eng d
999 |c 46781  |d 46781 
022 |a 0926-6690 
024 |a 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.12.001 
040 |a AR-BaUFA  |c AR-BaUFA 
245 1 0 |a Arthropod communities related to different mixtures of oil [Glycine max L. Merr.] and essential oil [Artemisia annua L.] crops 
520 |a Plants can host many herbivores and their natural enemies during their growth cycles. For this reason, changes in the relative abundance of crop and weed plants in a monocropping system as well as different crop plants in an intercropping system may produce great bottom up impacts in the specific and functional structure of spontaneous communities of arthropods. The hypothesis of this study was that the combination of two contrasting species, soybean [Glycine max, Fabaceae, N 2 fixing plant] and annual wormwood [Artemisia annua, Asteraceae, VOCs plant], would be related to different spontaneous communities of arthropods depending on the proportion of each species, and this would favor crop biodiversity without compromising crop production. The objectives of the study were: [a] to analyze the differences of spontaneous communities of arthropods related to different soybean [S]-annual wormwood [W] mixtures, using standard crop management for S production in Argentina, [b] to determine S and W total biomass and W essential oil content and yield and, [c] to analyze the relationship between arthropod communities and crop productivity. Factorial field experiments with 3 replications were done during 2006 and 2007. S density was kept constant [40plantsm -2] and different W densities [plantsm -2] were added. Treatments were pure S, S+2W, S+4W, S+8W and pure W [8plantsm -2]. Arthropods were sampled at soybean full flowering and were classified in functional groups as herbivores and non-herbivores. S and W total and relative biomass and W essential oil content and yield from leaves and inflorescences were estimated in reproductive stage. Arthropod morphospecies abundance and richness were determined for each treatment. Data were analyzed using uni [ANOVA] and multivariate [CCA] techniques. Arthropods belonging to 7 orders presented a total richness of 48 morphospecies in 2006 and 36 in 2007, while total abundance was 379 in 2006 and 318 in 2007. The proportion of non-herbivores was higher than the proportion of herbivores. Different arthropod communities were observed according to each treatment. No differences were found among treatments in S+W and S total biomass production, while W total biomass and essential oil yield were both different among treatments. Relative biomass production of S and W was the main explanatory variable related to the contrast of arthropod communities between pure annual wormwood [W] and the rest of the treatments. Annual wormwood could be used as an accompanying essential oil crop or left as a weed in the densities tested in this work, favoring biodiversity and, eventually, pest management without compromising soybean crop yield. 
653 0 |a CROP 
653 0 |a HERBIVORES 
653 0 |a VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS [VOCS] 
653 0 |a WEED 
653 0 |a ARGENTINA 
653 0 |a ARTEMISIA ANNUA 
653 0 |a ASTERACEAE 
653 0 |a BIOMASS PRODUCTIONS 
653 0 |a CROP MANAGEMENTS 
653 0 |a CROP PLANTS 
653 0 |a CROP PRODUCTION 
653 0 |a CROP PRODUCTIVITY 
653 0 |a CROP YIELD 
653 0 |a EXPLANATORY VARIABLES 
653 0 |a FIELD EXPERIMENT 
653 0 |a FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE 
653 0 |a GLYCINE MAX 
653 0 |a GROWTH CYCLE 
653 0 |a MONOCROPPING 
653 0 |a MORPHO-SPECIES 
653 0 |a NATURAL ENEMIES 
653 0 |a PEST MANAGEMENT 
653 0 |a RELATIVE ABUNDANCE 
653 0 |a REPRODUCTIVE STAGE 
653 0 |a TOTAL BIOMASS 
653 0 |a WEED PLANTS 
653 0 |a AMINO ACIDS 
653 0 |a ANIMALS 
653 0 |a BIODIVERSITY 
653 0 |a BIOMASS 
653 0 |a CROPS 
653 0 |a CULTIVATION 
653 0 |a FUNCTIONAL GROUPS 
653 0 |a NITROGEN FIXATION 
653 0 |a PLANTS [BOTANY] 
653 0 |a VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 
653 0 |a WELL STIMULATION 
653 0 |a ESSENTIAL OILS 
653 0 |a ARTHROPOD 
653 0 |a BIOCONTROL AGENT 
653 0 |a BIOLOGICAL CONTROL 
653 0 |a COMMUNITY STRUCTURE 
653 0 |a CROP PRODUCTION 
653 0 |a CROP YIELD 
653 0 |a DICOTYLEDON 
653 0 |a ESSENTIAL OIL 
653 0 |a EXPERIMENTAL STUDY 
653 0 |a FLOWERING 
653 0 |a HERBIVORE 
653 0 |a HOST PLANT 
653 0 |a HYPOTHESIS TESTING 
653 0 |a INTERCROPPING 
653 0 |a MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS 
653 0 |a NATURAL ENEMY 
653 0 |a RELATIVE ABUNDANCE 
653 0 |a SOYBEAN 
653 0 |a VARIANCE ANALYSIS 
653 0 |a VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND 
653 0 |a ARTHROPODA 
653 0 |a FABACEAE 
700 1 |9 22197  |a Lenardis, Adriana Ester 
700 1 |9 14518  |a Morvillo, Claudia Mariela 
700 1 |9 9697  |a Gil, Alejandra 
700 1 |9 7808  |a De la Fuente, Elba Beatriz 
773 |t Industrial Crops and Products  |g Vol.34, no.2 (2011), p.1340-1347 
856 |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Lenardis.pdf  |i En reservorio  |q application/pdf  |f 2011Lenardis  |x MIGRADOS2018 
856 |u http://www.elsevier.com/  |x MIGRADOS2018  |z LINK AL EDITOR 
900 |a as 
900 |a 20131220 
900 |a N 
900 |a SCOPUS 
900 |a a 
900 |a s 
900 |a ARTICULO 
900 |a EN LINEA 
900 |a 09266690 
900 |a 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.12.001 
900 |a ^tArthropod communities related to different mixtures of oil [Glycine max L. Merr.] and essential oil [Artemisia annua L.] crops 
900 |a ^aLenardis^bA.E. 
900 |a ^aMorvillo^bC.M. 
900 |a ^aGil^bA. 
900 |a ^aDe la Fuente^bE.B. 
900 |a ^aLenardis^bA. E. 
900 |a ^aMorvillo^bC. M. 
900 |a ^aGil^bA. 
900 |a ^aDe la Fuente^bE. B. 
900 |a ^aLenardis^bA.E.^tDepartamento de Producción Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, [1417] Buenos Aires, Argentina 
900 |a ^aMorvillo^bC.M. 
900 |a ^aGil^bA. 
900 |a ^ade la Fuente^bE.B. 
900 |a ^tIndustrial Crops and Products^cInd. Crops Prod. 
900 |a en 
900 |a 1340 
900 |a ^i 
900 |a Vol. 34, no. 2 
900 |a 1347 
900 |a CROP 
900 |a HERBIVORES 
900 |a VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS [VOCS] 
900 |a WEED 
900 |a ARGENTINA 
900 |a ARTEMISIA ANNUA 
900 |a ASTERACEAE 
900 |a BIOMASS PRODUCTIONS 
900 |a CROP MANAGEMENTS 
900 |a CROP PLANTS 
900 |a CROP PRODUCTION 
900 |a CROP PRODUCTIVITY 
900 |a CROP YIELD 
900 |a EXPLANATORY VARIABLES 
900 |a FIELD EXPERIMENT 
900 |a FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE 
900 |a GLYCINE MAX 
900 |a GROWTH CYCLE 
900 |a MONOCROPPING 
900 |a MORPHO-SPECIES 
900 |a NATURAL ENEMIES 
900 |a PEST MANAGEMENT 
900 |a RELATIVE ABUNDANCE 
900 |a REPRODUCTIVE STAGE 
900 |a TOTAL BIOMASS 
900 |a WEED PLANTS 
900 |a AMINO ACIDS 
900 |a ANIMALS 
900 |a BIODIVERSITY 
900 |a BIOMASS 
900 |a CROPS 
900 |a CULTIVATION 
900 |a FUNCTIONAL GROUPS 
900 |a NITROGEN FIXATION 
900 |a PLANTS [BOTANY] 
900 |a VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 
900 |a WELL STIMULATION 
900 |a ESSENTIAL OILS 
900 |a ARTHROPOD 
900 |a BIOCONTROL AGENT 
900 |a BIOLOGICAL CONTROL 
900 |a COMMUNITY STRUCTURE 
900 |a CROP PRODUCTION 
900 |a CROP YIELD 
900 |a DICOTYLEDON 
900 |a ESSENTIAL OIL 
900 |a EXPERIMENTAL STUDY 
900 |a FLOWERING 
900 |a HERBIVORE 
900 |a HOST PLANT 
900 |a HYPOTHESIS TESTING 
900 |a INTERCROPPING 
900 |a MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS 
900 |a NATURAL ENEMY 
900 |a RELATIVE ABUNDANCE 
900 |a SOYBEAN 
900 |a VARIANCE ANALYSIS 
900 |a VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND 
900 |a ARTHROPODA 
900 |a FABACEAE 
900 |a Plants can host many herbivores and their natural enemies during their growth cycles. For this reason, changes in the relative abundance of crop and weed plants in a monocropping system as well as different crop plants in an intercropping system may produce great bottom up impacts in the specific and functional structure of spontaneous communities of arthropods. The hypothesis of this study was that the combination of two contrasting species, soybean [Glycine max, Fabaceae, N 2 fixing plant] and annual wormwood [Artemisia annua, Asteraceae, VOCs plant], would be related to different spontaneous communities of arthropods depending on the proportion of each species, and this would favor crop biodiversity without compromising crop production. The objectives of the study were: [a] to analyze the differences of spontaneous communities of arthropods related to different soybean [S]-annual wormwood [W] mixtures, using standard crop management for S production in Argentina, [b] to determine S and W total biomass and W essential oil content and yield and, [c] to analyze the relationship between arthropod communities and crop productivity. Factorial field experiments with 3 replications were done during 2006 and 2007. S density was kept constant [40plantsm -2] and different W densities [plantsm -2] were added. Treatments were pure S, S+2W, S+4W, S+8W and pure W [8plantsm -2]. Arthropods were sampled at soybean full flowering and were classified in functional groups as herbivores and non-herbivores. S and W total and relative biomass and W essential oil content and yield from leaves and inflorescences were estimated in reproductive stage. Arthropod morphospecies abundance and richness were determined for each treatment. Data were analyzed using uni [ANOVA] and multivariate [CCA] techniques. Arthropods belonging to 7 orders presented a total richness of 48 morphospecies in 2006 and 36 in 2007, while total abundance was 379 in 2006 and 318 in 2007. The proportion of non-herbivores was higher than the proportion of herbivores. Different arthropod communities were observed according to each treatment. No differences were found among treatments in S+W and S total biomass production, while W total biomass and essential oil yield were both different among treatments. Relative biomass production of S and W was the main explanatory variable related to the contrast of arthropod communities between pure annual wormwood [W] and the rest of the treatments. Annual wormwood could be used as an accompanying essential oil crop or left as a weed in the densities tested in this work, favoring biodiversity and, eventually, pest management without compromising soybean crop yield. 
900 |a 34 
900 |a 2 
900 |a 2011 
900 |a ^cH 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a AGROVOC 
900 |a 2011Lenardis 
900 |a AAG 
900 |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2011Lenardis.pdf 
900 |a 2011Lenardis.pdf 
900 |a http://www.elsevier.com/ 
900 |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79960362347&partnerID=40&md5=72aab23a3fae7ba09a8c1bf848259648 
900 |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i 
900 |a OS 
942 0 0 |c ARTICULO  |2 udc 
942 0 0 |c ENLINEA  |2 udc