Regional forage production assessment in arid and semi - arid rangelands a step towards social - ecological analysis
Many of the complex issues worldwide regarding environmental management and sustainable develo-pment require integrating the social and natural sciences. Nevertheless, while theoretical discussions have been increasingly developed, operative issues are still major barriers to integrated social-ecolo...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | |
Formato: | Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Easdale.pdf LINK AL EDITOR |
Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
LEADER | 07179nab a22012497a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | AR-BaUFA000219 | ||
003 | AR-BaUFA | ||
005 | 20220926163446.0 | ||
008 | 181208t2012 |||||o|||||00||||spa d | ||
999 | |c 46653 |d 46653 | ||
022 | |a 0140-1963 | ||
024 | |a 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.03.002 | ||
040 | |a AR-BaUFA |c AR-BaUFA | ||
100 | 1 | |a Easdale, Marcos H. |9 30509 | |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Regional forage production assessment in arid and semi - arid rangelands |b a step towards social - ecological analysis |
520 | |a Many of the complex issues worldwide regarding environmental management and sustainable develo-pment require integrating the social and natural sciences. Nevertheless, while theoretical discussions have been increasingly developed, operative issues are still major barriers to integrated social-ecological analysis. The aim of this paper was to assess regional forage production in semi-arid rangelands as a key feature in social-ecological analysis, by using human organizational units [i.e. counties]. We used these state-administrative units to explore demographic and farming indicators in order to address socio-productive implications of different regional forage production dynamics. We studied the forage spatial and temporal dynamics in two different large ecological regions: Monte and Patagonia, under a single administrative unit [i.e. province]. Since forage production estimations in arid rangelands are not trivial, we tested two different methods. We found that inter-annual variability in forage production explained the main differences between regions. At a regional level, zones with higher temporal variability in forage production registered less rural residents and farm numbers, but inverse situations were registered at sub-regional scales. We found a non-linear relationship between forage production variability and rural population density. We proposed differentiated policy recommendations regarding rangeland management and animal husbandry, considering both the social and ecological contexts. | ||
653 | 0 | |a LIVESTOCK | |
653 | 0 | |a MONTE | |
653 | 0 | |a PATAGONIA | |
653 | 0 | |a POLICY DESIGN | |
653 | 0 | |a REMOTE SENSING | |
653 | 0 | |a SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS | |
653 | 0 | |a TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIABILITY | |
653 | 0 | |a VULNERABILITY | |
653 | 0 | |a ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM | |
653 | 0 | |a AGRICULTURAL POLICY | |
653 | 0 | |a AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION | |
653 | 0 | |a ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE | |
653 | 0 | |a ANIMAL HUSBANDRY | |
653 | 0 | |a ARID ENVIRONMENT | |
653 | 0 | |a FORAGE | |
653 | 0 | |a LIVESTOCK FARMING | |
653 | 0 | |a POPULATION DENSITY | |
653 | 0 | |a RANGELAND | |
653 | 0 | |a RURAL POPULATION | |
653 | 0 | |a SEMIARID REGION | |
653 | 0 | |a SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS | |
653 | 0 | |a SUSTAINABILITY | |
653 | 0 | |a THEORETICAL STUDY | |
653 | 0 | |a ANIMALIA | |
700 | 1 | |9 12939 |a Aguiar, Martín Roberto | |
773 | |t Journal of Arid Environments |g Vol.83 (2012), p.35-44 | ||
856 | |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Easdale.pdf |i En reservorio |q application/pdf |f 2012Easdale |x MIGRADOS2018 | ||
856 | |u http://www.elsevier.com/ |x MIGRADOS2018 |z LINK AL EDITOR | ||
900 | |a as | ||
900 | |a 20131220 | ||
900 | |a N | ||
900 | |a SCOPUS | ||
900 | |a a | ||
900 | |a s | ||
900 | |a ARTICULO | ||
900 | |a EN LINEA | ||
900 | |a 01401963 | ||
900 | |a 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.03.002 | ||
900 | |a ^tRegional forage production assessment in arid and semi-arid rangelands^sa step towards social-ecological analysis | ||
900 | |a ^aEasdale^bM.H. | ||
900 | |a ^aAguiar^bM.R. | ||
900 | |a ^aEasdale^bM. H. | ||
900 | |a ^aAguiar^bM. R. | ||
900 | |a ^aEasdale^bM.H.^tInstituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria [INTA] - Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche, Ã_rea de Desarrollo Rural, Grupo de Investigación en Sistemas de Producción y Territorios, Modesta Victoria 4450, [8400] San Carlos de Bariloche, RÃo Negro, Argentina | ||
900 | |a ^aAguiar^bM.R.^tCátedra de EcologÃa - IFEVA, Facultad de AgronomÃa, Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET, Av. San MartÃn 4453, C1417DSE, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina | ||
900 | |a ^tJournal of Arid Environments^cJ. Arid Environ. | ||
900 | |a eng | ||
900 | |a 35 | ||
900 | |a ^i | ||
900 | |a Vol. 83 | ||
900 | |a 44 | ||
900 | |a LIVESTOCK | ||
900 | |a MONTE | ||
900 | |a PATAGONIA | ||
900 | |a POLICY DESIGN | ||
900 | |a REMOTE SENSING | ||
900 | |a SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS | ||
900 | |a TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIABILITY | ||
900 | |a VULNERABILITY | ||
900 | |a ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM | ||
900 | |a AGRICULTURAL POLICY | ||
900 | |a AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION | ||
900 | |a ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE | ||
900 | |a ANIMAL HUSBANDRY | ||
900 | |a ARID ENVIRONMENT | ||
900 | |a FORAGE | ||
900 | |a LIVESTOCK FARMING | ||
900 | |a POPULATION DENSITY | ||
900 | |a RANGELAND | ||
900 | |a RURAL POPULATION | ||
900 | |a SEMIARID REGION | ||
900 | |a SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS | ||
900 | |a SUSTAINABILITY | ||
900 | |a THEORETICAL STUDY | ||
900 | |a ANIMALIA | ||
900 | |a Many of the complex issues worldwide regarding environmental management and sustainable develo-pment require integrating the social and natural sciences. Nevertheless, while theoretical discussions have been increasingly developed, operative issues are still major barriers to integrated social-ecological analysis. The aim of this paper was to assess regional forage production in semi-arid rangelands as a key feature in social-ecological analysis, by using human organizational units [i.e. counties]. We used these state-administrative units to explore demographic and farming indicators in order to address socio-productive implications of different regional forage production dynamics. We studied the forage spatial and temporal dynamics in two different large ecological regions: Monte and Patagonia, under a single administrative unit [i.e. province]. Since forage production estimations in arid rangelands are not trivial, we tested two different methods. We found that inter-annual variability in forage production explained the main differences between regions. At a regional level, zones with higher temporal variability in forage production registered less rural residents and farm numbers, but inverse situations were registered at sub-regional scales. We found a non-linear relationship between forage production variability and rural population density. We proposed differentiated policy recommendations regarding rangeland management and animal husbandry, considering both the social and ecological contexts. | ||
900 | |a 83 | ||
900 | |a 2012 | ||
900 | |a ^cH | ||
900 | |a AAG | ||
900 | |a AGROVOC | ||
900 | |a 2012Easdale | ||
900 | |a AAG | ||
900 | |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Easdale.pdf | ||
900 | |a 2012Easdale.pdf | ||
900 | |a http://www.elsevier.com/ | ||
900 | |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84861309317&partnerID=40&md5=c80e2e397e25fd50ff16a9e95b429f82 | ||
900 | |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i | ||
900 | |a OS | ||
942 | 0 | 0 | |c ARTICULO |2 udc |
942 | 0 | 0 | |c ENLINEA |2 udc |