Ecosystem service evaluation to support land - use policy
Regular economic activity takes into account ecosystem goods and services that are exchanged for money in the market [e.g. food, fibre, water] but normally ignores more intangible ones left away from market transactions [e.g. soil protection, climate regulation, disturbance control, habitat provisio...
Guardado en:
| Otros Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Viglizzo.pdf LINK AL EDITOR |
| Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
| LEADER | 07222cab a22011897a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | AR-BaUFA000068 | ||
| 003 | AR-BaUFA | ||
| 005 | 20211229183643.0 | ||
| 008 | 181208t2012 |||||o|||||00||||eng d | ||
| 999 | |c 46502 |d 46502 | ||
| 022 | |a 0167-8809 | ||
| 024 | |a 10.1016/j.agee.2011.07.007 | ||
| 040 | |a AR-BaUFA |c AR-BaUFA | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ecosystem service evaluation to support land - use policy |
| 520 | |a Regular economic activity takes into account ecosystem goods and services that are exchanged for money in the market [e.g. food, fibre, water] but normally ignores more intangible ones left away from market transactions [e.g. soil protection, climate regulation, disturbance control, habitat provision], even in cases when they become irreversibly impaired. However, because of the increasing pressure brought by the public opinion, the attempts to assign an economic, yet volatile, valuation to ecosystems assets has multiplied in recent years, and policy communities are increasingly compelled to incorporate them into land use planning initiatives. Based on contributions to this special issue, we discuss how the perspective of ecosystem services can contribute to develop sound land-use policies and planning actions. Beyond valuation, several practical implications emerge from the contributions. A myriad of potential tradeoffs must be analyzed because since the provision of some services can be accompanied by the emergence of unexpected dis-services. For example, carbon accumulation based on increasing net primary production rates may simultaneously cut water yields and, hence, water provision. Various existing mechanisms ranging from state-controlled to market-controlled for rewarding the provision of ecosystem services are analyzed and discussed in terms of their capacity to connect nature to land-use planning. | ||
| 653 | 0 | |a ECONOMIC AND BIOPHYSICAL VIEWS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a EVALUATION METHODS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a TRADEOFFS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a CARBON BUDGET | |
| 653 | 0 | |a CONTINGENT VALUATION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ECONOMIC ACTIVITY | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ECOSYSTEM SERVICE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a LAND USE PLANNING | |
| 653 | 0 | |a NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION | |
| 653 | 0 | |a POLICY APPROACH | |
| 653 | 0 | |a PUBLIC ATTITUDE | |
| 653 | 0 | |a SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT | |
| 653 | 0 | |a TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS | |
| 653 | 0 | |a TRADE-OFF | |
| 653 | 0 | |a WATER YIELD | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 5215 |a Viglizzo, Ernesto F. | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 788 |a Paruelo, José María | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 47971 |a Laterra, Pedro | |
| 700 | 1 | |9 7390 |a Jobbágy, Esteban G. | |
| 773 | |t Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment |g Vol.154 (2012), p.78-84 | ||
| 856 | |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Viglizzo.pdf |i En reservorio |q application/pdf |f 2012Viglizzo |x MIGRADOS2018 | ||
| 856 | |u http://www.elsevier.com/ |x MIGRADOS2018 |z LINK AL EDITOR | ||
| 900 | |a as | ||
| 900 | |a 20131220 | ||
| 900 | |a N | ||
| 900 | |a SCOPUS | ||
| 900 | |a a | ||
| 900 | |a s | ||
| 900 | |a ARTICULO | ||
| 900 | |a EN LINEA | ||
| 900 | |a 01678809 | ||
| 900 | |a 10.1016/j.agee.2011.07.007 | ||
| 900 | |a ^tEcosystem service evaluation to support land-use policy | ||
| 900 | |a ^aViglizzo^bE.F. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aParuelo^bJ.M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aLaterra^bP. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aJobbágy^bE.G. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aViglizzo^bE. F. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aParuelo^bJ. M. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aLaterra^bP. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aJobbágy^bE. G. | ||
| 900 | |a ^aViglizzo, E.F.^tINTA, EEA Anguil, Grupo de Investigaciones en Gestión Ambiental [GIGA], Av. Spinetto 785, 6300 Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^aParuelo, J.M.^tINCITAP-CONICET, Ruta 35, km 335, 6300 Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^aLaterra, P.^tUNLPam, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Av. Uruguay 151, 6300 Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^aJobbágy, E.G.^tLaboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección, Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos Sistemas de información, Facultad de Agronomía and IFEVA, Universidad de Buenos Aires and CONICET, Avda. San Martín, 4453 Buenos Aires, 1417, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^tUnidad Integrada Balcarce: EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, CC 276, 7620 Balcarce, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^tCONICET, Andes 950, 5700, San Luis, San Luis, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^tGrupo de Estudios Ambientales IMASL, Ejército de los, Andes 950, 5700, San Luis, San Luis, Argentina | ||
| 900 | |a ^tAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment^cAgric. Ecosyst. Environ. | ||
| 900 | |a en | ||
| 900 | |a 78 | ||
| 900 | |a ^i | ||
| 900 | |a Vol. 154 | ||
| 900 | |a 84 | ||
| 900 | |a ECONOMIC AND BIOPHYSICAL VIEWS | ||
| 900 | |a EVALUATION METHODS | ||
| 900 | |a TRADEOFFS | ||
| 900 | |a CARBON BUDGET | ||
| 900 | |a CONTINGENT VALUATION | ||
| 900 | |a ECONOMIC ACTIVITY | ||
| 900 | |a ECOSYSTEM SERVICE | ||
| 900 | |a ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS | ||
| 900 | |a LAND USE PLANNING | ||
| 900 | |a NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION | ||
| 900 | |a POLICY APPROACH | ||
| 900 | |a PUBLIC ATTITUDE | ||
| 900 | |a SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 900 | |a TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS | ||
| 900 | |a TRADE-OFF | ||
| 900 | |a WATER YIELD | ||
| 900 | |a Regular economic activity takes into account ecosystem goods and services that are exchanged for money in the market [e.g. food, fibre, water] but normally ignores more intangible ones left away from market transactions [e.g. soil protection, climate regulation, disturbance control, habitat provision], even in cases when they become irreversibly impaired. However, because of the increasing pressure brought by the public opinion, the attempts to assign an economic, yet volatile, valuation to ecosystems assets has multiplied in recent years, and policy communities are increasingly compelled to incorporate them into land use planning initiatives. Based on contributions to this special issue, we discuss how the perspective of ecosystem services can contribute to develop sound land-use policies and planning actions. Beyond valuation, several practical implications emerge from the contributions. A myriad of potential tradeoffs must be analyzed because since the provision of some services can be accompanied by the emergence of unexpected dis-services. For example, carbon accumulation based on increasing net primary production rates may simultaneously cut water yields and, hence, water provision. Various existing mechanisms ranging from state-controlled to market-controlled for rewarding the provision of ecosystem services are analyzed and discussed in terms of their capacity to connect nature to land-use planning. | ||
| 900 | |a 154 | ||
| 900 | |a 2012 | ||
| 900 | |a ^cH | ||
| 900 | |a AAG | ||
| 900 | |a AGROVOC | ||
| 900 | |a 2012Viglizzo | ||
| 900 | |a AAG | ||
| 900 | |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Viglizzo.pdf | ||
| 900 | |a 2012Viglizzo.pdf | ||
| 900 | |a http://www.elsevier.com/ | ||
| 900 | |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84859722642&partnerID=40&md5=3f3dbfebf9e55dd668fed86f26dc2549 | ||
| 900 | |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i | ||
| 900 | |a OS | ||
| 942 | 0 | 0 | |c ARTICULO |2 udc |
| 942 | 0 | 0 | |c ENLINEA |2 udc |