Connectance of species interaction networks and conservation value is it any good to be well connected?
Recently, the focus of conservation efforts gradually changed from a species-centred approach to a broader ambition of conserving functional ecosystems. This new approach relies on the understanding that much ecosystem function is a result of the interaction of species to form complex interaction ne...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | , |
Formato: | Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Heleno.pdf LINK AL EDITOR. |
Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
LEADER | 07543cab a22013577a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | AR-BaUFA000037 | ||
003 | AR-BaUFA | ||
005 | 20220916111226.0 | ||
008 | 181208t2012 |||||o|||||00||||eng d | ||
999 | |c 46471 |d 46471 | ||
022 | |a 1470-160X | ||
024 | |a 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.032 | ||
040 | |a AR-BaUFA |c AR-BaUFA | ||
100 | 1 | |a Heleno, Ruben |9 67200 | |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Connectance of species interaction networks and conservation value |b is it any good to be well connected? |
520 | |a Recently, the focus of conservation efforts gradually changed from a species-centred approach to a broader ambition of conserving functional ecosystems. This new approach relies on the understanding that much ecosystem function is a result of the interaction of species to form complex interaction networks. Therefore measures summarising holistic attributes of such ecological networks have the potential to provide useful indicators to guide and assess conservation objectives. The most generally accepted insight is that complexity in species interactions, measured by network connectance, is an important attribute of healthy communities which usually protects them from secondary extinctions. An implicit and overlooked corollary to this generalization is that conservation efforts should be directed to conserve highly connected communities. We conducted a literature review to search for empirical evidence of a relationship between connectance [complexity] and conservation value [communities on different stages of degradation]. Our results show that the often assumed positive relationship between highly connected and desirable [i.e. with high conservation value] communities does not derive from empirical data and that the topic deserves further discussion. Given the conflicting empirical evidence revealed in this study, it is clear that connectance on its own cannot provide clear information about conservation value. In the face of the ongoing biodiversity crisis, studies of species interaction networks should incorporate the different 'conservation value' of nodes [i.e. species] in a network if it is to be of practical use in guiding and evaluating conservation practice. | ||
653 | 0 | |a COMMUNITY | |
653 | 0 | |a COMPLEXITY | |
653 | 0 | |a FOOD WEBS | |
653 | 0 | |a RARE SPECIES | |
653 | 0 | |a STABILITY | |
653 | 0 | |a BIODIVERSITY CRISIS | |
653 | 0 | |a COMPLEX INTERACTION | |
653 | 0 | |a CONNECTANCE | |
653 | 0 | |a ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS | |
653 | 0 | |a ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS | |
653 | 0 | |a EMPIRICAL DATA | |
653 | 0 | |a EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE | |
653 | 0 | |a LITERATURE REVIEWS | |
653 | 0 | |a RARE SPECIES | |
653 | 0 | |a SPECIES INTERACTIONS | |
653 | 0 | |a BIODIVERSITY | |
653 | 0 | |a ECOSYSTEMS | |
653 | 0 | |a USER INTERFACES | |
653 | 0 | |a ACTIVE NETWORKS | |
653 | 0 | |a BIODIVERSITY | |
653 | 0 | |a CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT | |
653 | 0 | |a ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION | |
653 | 0 | |a EXTINCTION | |
653 | 0 | |a HOLISTIC APPROACH | |
653 | 0 | |a LITERATURE REVIEW | |
653 | 0 | |a NETWORK ANALYSIS | |
700 | 1 | |9 11883 |a Devoto, Mariano | |
700 | 1 | |a Pocock, M. |9 69378 | |
773 | |t Ecological Indicators |g Vol.14, no.1 (2012), p.7-10 | ||
856 | |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Heleno.pdf |i En reservorio |q application/pdf |f 2012Heleno |x MIGRADOS2018 | ||
856 | |u http://www.elsevier.com/ |x MIGRADOS2018 |z LINK AL EDITOR. | ||
900 | |a as | ||
900 | |a 20131220 | ||
900 | |a N | ||
900 | |a SCOPUS | ||
900 | |a a | ||
900 | |a s | ||
900 | |a ARTICULO | ||
900 | |a EN LINEA | ||
900 | |a 1470160X | ||
900 | |a 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.032 | ||
900 | |a ^tConnectance of species interaction networks and conservation value^sIs it any good to be well connected? | ||
900 | |a ^aHeleno^bR. | ||
900 | |a ^aDevoto^bM. | ||
900 | |a ^aPocock^bM. | ||
900 | |a ^aHeleno^bR. | ||
900 | |a ^aDevoto^bM. | ||
900 | |a ^aPocock^bM. | ||
900 | |a ^aHeleno, R.^tMediterranean Institute of Advanced Studies [CSIC-UIB], c/ Miquel Marqués 21, 07190 Esporles, Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain | ||
900 | |a ^aDevoto, M.^tFacultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, C1417DSE, Buenos Aires, Argentina | ||
900 | |a ^aPocock, M.^tSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom | ||
900 | |a ^tEcological Indicators^cEcol. Indic. | ||
900 | |a en | ||
900 | |a 7 | ||
900 | |a ^i | ||
900 | |a Vol. 14, no. 1 | ||
900 | |a 10 | ||
900 | |a COMMUNITY | ||
900 | |a COMPLEXITY | ||
900 | |a FOOD WEBS | ||
900 | |a RARE SPECIES | ||
900 | |a STABILITY | ||
900 | |a BIODIVERSITY CRISIS | ||
900 | |a COMPLEX INTERACTION | ||
900 | |a CONNECTANCE | ||
900 | |a ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS | ||
900 | |a ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS | ||
900 | |a EMPIRICAL DATA | ||
900 | |a EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE | ||
900 | |a LITERATURE REVIEWS | ||
900 | |a RARE SPECIES | ||
900 | |a SPECIES INTERACTIONS | ||
900 | |a BIODIVERSITY | ||
900 | |a ECOSYSTEMS | ||
900 | |a USER INTERFACES | ||
900 | |a ACTIVE NETWORKS | ||
900 | |a BIODIVERSITY | ||
900 | |a CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT | ||
900 | |a ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION | ||
900 | |a EXTINCTION | ||
900 | |a HOLISTIC APPROACH | ||
900 | |a LITERATURE REVIEW | ||
900 | |a NETWORK ANALYSIS | ||
900 | |a Recently, the focus of conservation efforts gradually changed from a species-centred approach to a broader ambition of conserving functional ecosystems. This new approach relies on the understanding that much ecosystem function is a result of the interaction of species to form complex interaction networks. Therefore measures summarising holistic attributes of such ecological networks have the potential to provide useful indicators to guide and assess conservation objectives. The most generally accepted insight is that complexity in species interactions, measured by network connectance, is an important attribute of healthy communities which usually protects them from secondary extinctions. An implicit and overlooked corollary to this generalization is that conservation efforts should be directed to conserve highly connected communities. We conducted a literature review to search for empirical evidence of a relationship between connectance [complexity] and conservation value [communities on different stages of degradation]. Our results show that the often assumed positive relationship between highly connected and desirable [i.e. with high conservation value] communities does not derive from empirical data and that the topic deserves further discussion. Given the conflicting empirical evidence revealed in this study, it is clear that connectance on its own cannot provide clear information about conservation value. In the face of the ongoing biodiversity crisis, studies of species interaction networks should incorporate the different 'conservation value' of nodes [i.e. species] in a network if it is to be of practical use in guiding and evaluating conservation practice. | ||
900 | |a 14 | ||
900 | |a 1 | ||
900 | |a 2012 | ||
900 | |a ^cH | ||
900 | |a AAG | ||
900 | |a AGROVOC | ||
900 | |a 2012Heleno | ||
900 | |a AAG | ||
900 | |a http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012Heleno.pdf | ||
900 | |a 2012Heleno.pdf | ||
900 | |a http://www.elsevier.com/ | ||
900 | |a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-80053344007&partnerID=40&md5=c4364e6b3d3ff8679f1bb1cb9b14aff8 | ||
900 | |a ^a^b^c^d^e^f^g^h^i | ||
900 | |a OS | ||
942 | 0 | 0 | |c ARTICULO |2 udc |
942 | 0 | 0 | |c ENLINEA |2 udc |