Using APAR to predict aboveground plant productivity in semi - arid rangelands spatial and temporal relationships differ

Monitoring of aboveground net primary production (ANPP) is critical for effective management of rangeland ecosystems but is problematic due to the vast extent of rangelands globally, and the high costs of ground-based measurements. Remote sensing of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Gaffney, Rowan, Porensky, Lauren M., Gao, Feng, Irisarri, Jorge Gonzalo Nicolás, Durante, Martín, Derner, Justin D., Augustine, David J.
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2018gaffney.pdf
LINK AL EDITOR
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
LEADER 04598nab a22005057a 4500
001 20181214114656.0
003 AR-BaUFA
005 20230405101157.0
008 181214|2018 sq |||||o|||| 00| | eng d
999 |c 46058  |d 46058 
999 |d 46058 
999 |d 46058 
999 |d 46058 
999 |d 46058 
999 |d 46058 
999 |d 46058 
999 |d 46058 
999 |d 46058 
022 |a 2072-4292 
024 |a 10.3390/rs10091474 
040 |a AR-BaUFA 
245 1 |a Using APAR to predict aboveground plant productivity in semi - arid rangelands  |b spatial and temporal relationships differ 
520 |a Monitoring of aboveground net primary production (ANPP) is critical for effective management of rangeland ecosystems but is problematic due to the vast extent of rangelands globally, and the high costs of ground-based measurements. Remote sensing of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR) can be used to predict ANPP, potentially offering an alternative means of quantifying ANPP at both high temporal and spatial resolution across broad spatial extents. The relationship between ANPP and APAR has often been quantified based on either spatial variation across a broad region or temporal variation at a location over time, but rarely both. Here we assess: (i) if the relationship between ANPP and APAR is consistent when evaluated across time and space; (ii) potential factors driving differences between temporal versus spatial models, and (iii) the magnitude of potential errors relating to space for time transformations in quantifying productivity. Using two complimentary ANPP datasets and remotely sensed data derived from MODIS and a Landsat/MODIS fusion data product, we find that slopes of spatial models are generally greater than slopes of temporal models. The abundance of plant species with different structural attributes, specifically the abundance of C4 shortgrasses with prostrate canopies versus taller, more productive C3 species with more vertically complex canopies, tended to vary more dramatically in space than over time. This difference in spatial versus temporal variation in these key plant functional groups appears to be the primary driver of differences in slopes among regression models. While the individual models revealed strong relationships between ANPP to APAR, the use of temporal models to predict variation in space (or vice versa) can increase error in remotely sensed predictions of ANPP. 
653 |a NDVI 
653 |a TEMPORAL 
653 |a SPATIAL 
653 |a PLANT COMPOSITION 
653 |a RADIATION USE EFFICIENCY 
653 |a MODIS 
653 |a LANDSAT 
653 |a BIOMASS 
653 |a ANPP 
700 1 |a Gaffney, Rowan  |u US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Rangeland Resources and Systems Research Unit. Fort Collins, CO, USA.  |9 68175 
700 1 |a Porensky, Lauren M.   |u US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Rangeland Resources and Systems Research Unit. Fort Collins, CO, USA.  |9 68177 
700 1 |a Gao, Feng  |u US Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Agricultural Research Service (ARS). Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory. Beltsville, USA.  |9 68178 
700 1 |9 12998  |a Irisarri, Jorge Gonzalo Nicolás  |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección (LART). Buenos Aires, Argentina.  |u CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA). Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección (LART). Buenos Aires, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 26775  |a Durante, Martín  |u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay (EEA Concepción del Uruguay). Entre Ríos, Argentina. 
700 1 |9 68313  |a Derner, Justin D.   |u USDA-ARS Rangeland Resources and Systems Research Unit. Cheyenne, USA. 
700 1 |a Augustine, David J.  |u US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Rangeland Resources and Systems Research Unit. Fort Collins, CO, USA.  |9 68180 
773 |t Remote Sensing  |g vol.10, no.9 (2018), p.2-19, grafs., tbls. 
856 |f 2018gaffney  |i en internet  |q application/pdf  |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/download/articulo/2018gaffney.pdf  |x ARTI201902 
856 |z LINK AL EDITOR   |u https://www.mdpi.com 
942 1 |c ARTICULO 
942 1 |c ENLINEA 
976 |a AAG