Reply to comments on: “Tethyan calpionellids in the Neuquén Basin (Argentine Andes), their significance in defining the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary and pathways for Tethyan-Eastern Pacific connections” by Kietzmann & Iglesia Llanos
The comments by Kietzmann & Iglesia Llanos (Comment on “Tethyan calpionellids in the Neuquén Basin (Argentine Andes), their significance in defining the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary and pathways for Tethyan-Eastern Pacific connections” by R. López-Martínez, B. Aguirre-Urreta, M. Lescano, A. Conc...
Guardado en:
| Publicado: |
2018
|
|---|---|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_08959811_v84_n_p448_LopezMartinez http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_08959811_v84_n_p448_LopezMartinez |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The comments by Kietzmann & Iglesia Llanos (Comment on “Tethyan calpionellids in the Neuquén Basin (Argentine Andes), their significance in defining the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary and pathways for Tethyan-Eastern Pacific connections” by R. López-Martínez, B. Aguirre-Urreta, M. Lescano, A. Concheyro, V. Vennari and V. Ramos) on our paper published in the Journal of South American Earth Sciences 78 (2017): 116-125, provide a worthy opportunity to further clarify our observations and interpretations regarding the importance of precise biostratigraphic studies in the definition of the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary in the Argentine Andes. These include the calpionellids as primary markers, the classic and widespread nannofossils bioevents as secondary markers, together with a detailed ammonite zonation. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd |
|---|