Estrategias discursivas en contra del lenguaje inclusivo de género no-binario en X
This study analyzes the discourse strategies deployed against the use and/or promotion of non-binary gender inclusive language in Uruguay (2018-2024) in a corpus of 8,316 posts collected from X, a digital environment which has proved to be particularly relevant for public disputes and polemics. Draw...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Lingüística. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Universidad de Buenos Aires
2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/sys/article/view/17521 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This study analyzes the discourse strategies deployed against the use and/or promotion of non-binary gender inclusive language in Uruguay (2018-2024) in a corpus of 8,316 posts collected from X, a digital environment which has proved to be particularly relevant for public disputes and polemics. Drawing on basic Corpus Linguistics Tools (keywords, concordances and collocations), three main discourse strategies are identified, representing inclusive language as an imposition, as unnecessary and as false inclusion. For its part, Critical Discourse Analysis tools (ideological squaring and assumptions) are employed to analyze how these strategies operate ideologically, i.e. the representational systems they sustain and their rhetorical effects. Methodologically, the study discusses the problems, needs and demands of CDA research designs addressing big amounts of data, such as those collected from social media. Findings point to different mechanisms through which inclusive language is construed as polemical by (dis)articulating specific language and social ideologies which serve the exclusionary purpose of reinforcing gender binary identities and condemning non-binary linguistic resources. |
|---|