El diseño industrial y los productos industriales en la Argentina desde 1952 hasta 1983 : tensiones entre diseño, tecnología y políticas económicas
This thesis addresses the relationship between design, economy, politics and the development of technology, in order to evidence the tensions between these fields, founded in the actions of different state agencies in Argentina between the years 1952 and 1983 in the context of the Segundo Plan Quinq...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Tesis doctoral acceptedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Urbanismo
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=aaqtesis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_7077 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/aaqtesis/index/assoc/HWA_7077.dir/7077.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This thesis addresses the relationship between design, economy, politics and the development of technology, in order to evidence the tensions between these fields, founded in the actions of different state agencies in Argentina between the years 1952 and 1983 in the context of the Segundo Plan Quinquenal until the end of the government of the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional, from three scenarios and from the different cases of study. Within this period of time, two different paths are analyzed in terms of the practices of design, pragmatics and academic field, and how one of them prevailed.
The first scenario began with the failed project to develop a locomotive industry, the Fábrica Argentina de Locomotoras (FADEL), which was originated simultaneously with the argentinian automotive industry represented by Industrias Aeronáuticas y Mecánicas del Estado (IAME). Although this is usually associated with the management of developmentalism and the establishment of multinational automotive companies in the early 1960s, there was a state company that began manufacturing automobiles ten years earlier.
The second scenario coincides with the Feria de America, where the visions of modernity and the industrialism of the State were united as two coexisting paradigms, through the meeting of the products that emerged in the industries of the State and modern design. Due to its scale, the fair was the most important event of modern design in Latin America in fulfillment of economical-political relations goals of the Peronist government.
The third scenario, under the hegemony of modern design in Argentina, involved the various actions of the Centro de Investigación de Diseño Industrial (CIDI), an institution through which the political and economic vicissitudes were evident, around the insertion of the field of design in various areas and the trajectories of companies that included design as part of their business policy. |
|---|