Sobre el control de constitucionalidad de los mecanismos de la democracia directa : Un análisis desde la teoría de la democracia deliberativa

Abstract: The question this paper aims to answer is how should courts analyze the outcomes of direct democracy mechanisms. The theoretical framework we choose is deliberative democracy theory. This theory provides us with arguments that let us say the level of deference courts should have for direct...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Vitaliani, Emiliano Martín
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones 2019
Materias:
Control de constitucionalidad
Mecanismos de democracia directa
Democracia deliberativa
Resultados de las políticas
Legislacion
Poder judicial
Referendum
Debate publico
Participacion democratica
Constitucion nacional
Imparcialidad e independecia de los jueces
Sociologia del derecho
Participacion ciudadana
Interpretacion de la constitucion
Control judicial de constitucionalidad
Principio de provisionalidad
Democracia representativa
Exclusion social
Desigualdad
Derechos de las minorias
Politicas publicas
MDD
Judicial review
Direct democracy
Deliberative democracy
Policy outcomes
Legislation
Control of constitutionality
Judicial power
Democratic participation
National constitution
Impartiality and the autonomy of judges
Minority rights
Citizen engagement
Interpretation of the constitution
Principle of provisionality
Representative democracy
Social exclusión
Inequality
Public policy
Acceso en línea:http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/102/sobre-el-control-de-constitucionalidad-de-los-mecanismos-de-democracia-directa.pdf
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pderecho/lecciones&cl=CL1&d=HWA_5529
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_5529.dir/5529.PDF
Aporte de:
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract: The question this paper aims to answer is how should courts analyze the outcomes of direct democracy mechanisms. The theoretical framework we choose is deliberative democracy theory. This theory provides us with arguments that let us say the level of deference courts should have for direct democracy outcomes is higher. Once we have said this, we will study to which degree Argentinian legislation satisfies some deliberative standard and thus, what is the level of deference Argentinian judges should have to direct democracy outcomes, concluding it is moderately high.

Ejemplares similares