July 2, 2006. "Before, during and after"
The author classifies good and bad aspects of the presidential election of July 2, 2006: quality of the voter registry; anticipation of a “closed” election; more or less balanced media follow-up of three leading contenders; biased opinions of the newscasters against CPBT, estimated expense on TV ad...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmop/article/view/41845 http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=mx/mx-047&d=article41845oai |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The author classifies good and bad aspects of the presidential election of July 2, 2006: quality of the voter registry; anticipation of a “closed” election; more or less balanced media follow-up of three leading contenders; biased opinions of the newscasters against CPBT, estimated expense on TV adds; IFE´s incursion on “estimation” exercises instead of outsourcing as in previous elections; use by political parties of legal channels to challenge results; and the non acceptance of the CPBT of the final official presidential election result. |
|---|