The UFPR rural education course: history and construction of pedagogical processes in teacher education for Brazilian rural contexts
In this article we bring the history of constitution of the Degree in Rural Education: Natural Sciences (LECAMPO) at the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR) implemented from the public educational policy Support Program for Higher Education in Rural Education (PROCAMPO) by the Secretariat for Contin...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Portugués |
| Publicado: |
IRICE (CONICET-UNR)
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/revistairice/article/view/1485 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In this article we bring the history of constitution of the Degree in Rural Education: Natural Sciences (LECAMPO) at the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR) implemented from the public educational policy Support Program for Higher Education in Rural Education (PROCAMPO) by the Secretariat for Continuing Education, Literacy, Diversity and Inclusion (SECADI) in the Ministry of Education (MEC) with the aim of training teachers to work in rural schools in different Brazilian rural contexts based on the work with the logic of formative times of the alternation regime. Our purpose was to outline the process of building the course within the historical framework of educational policy from 2014 to 2018. Our source of data were documents and statistics produced by the course, data from the Higher Education Census of the National Institute of Educational Studies and Research Anísio Teixeira (INEP) and the MEC evaluation report. We discussed the historical process of construction along two main axes: (a) the geographical scope of the course with the option of the strategy of decentralizing classes (roaming); (b) the differentiated or mat of the course’s pedagogical project (PPC) and the pedagogical practices regarding shared teaching as a political strategy to strengthen emancipator education based on the concrete reality of the subjects within the objectives of rural education. What we understand about this construction from its history is that LECAMPO has produced different ways of developing training processes for future educators, presenting data of evasion and positive conclusion in relation to other courses within the same area of knowledge, Natural Sciences, reflecting in the recent evaluation with maximum score. |
|---|