Between Naturalism and tradition. A comparative study between the pedagogical proposals of Spanish Enlightenment and Rousseau's.
Two interpretations have marked the historiography of the Spanish Enlightenment, first one that marked that everything new, crisp and important influence came from the French, and another who argued that the originality of it was given by its Catholic component. This paper attempts a comparative ana...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Investigaciones Socio-Históricas Regionales (ISHIR) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR)
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/v09a10 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Two interpretations have marked the historiography of the Spanish Enlightenment, first one that marked that everything new, crisp and important influence came from the French, and another who argued that the originality of it was given by its Catholic component. This paper attempts a comparative analysis of Rousseau’s pedagogy and pedagogical proposals of the Spanish Enlightenment. Based on the consideration that not everything new comes from the French influence, nor originality is given by the Catholic component of the Enlightenment, but the Spanish proposals are part of a complex system of “movement of ideas”, in which no only takes up elements of the European Enlightenment and the re means, but also originate themselves. |
|---|