Julio Barcos, behind the scenes of a reply against "La Doble Amenaza" lugoniana. Between feminism and revolution. Absences and Presences
The present work is a reflection about the distinctive characteristics assumed in the confrontation of Julio Barcos starting from the plots of a challenging anarchism. His scientific treaty “The Double Threat” swiftly faces the paradoxes expressed by Leopoldo Lugones in Theather Coliseo’s conference...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://cuadernosdelciesal.unr.edu.ar/index.php/inicio/article/view/189 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The present work is a reflection about the distinctive characteristics assumed in the confrontation of Julio Barcos starting from the plots of a challenging anarchism. His scientific treaty “The Double Threat” swiftly faces the paradoxes expressed by Leopoldo Lugones in Theather Coliseo’s conferences from the winter of 1923, as a nationalistic and conservative colophon of the right-wing politics. Specifically, we are interested in highlighting two matters found within the anarchist world, signed by an exceptional juncture; on the one hand, to ponder the specific value attributed to the working class as a revolutionary subject and on the other hand, to reflect about the absence and presence of the gender ideology enclosed in this debate. |
|---|