El Humanismo como obstáculo epistemológico del Trabajo Social: Una lectura crítica del texto “Humanismo y Trabajo Social” de Ezequiel Ander-Egg
This article offers a series of considerations about Humanism, particularly around its implications in Social Work. The paper offers an overview of the critical arguments about Humanism, made by some authors that come from different disciplines and epistemological orientations. Som...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales. Escuela de Trabajo Social
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://catedraparalela.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/214 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This article offers a series of considerations about Humanism, particularly around its implications in Social Work. The paper offers an overview of the critical arguments about Humanism, made by some authors that come from different disciplines and epistemological orientations. Some precedents can be found in the anti-metaphysical and anti-positivist philosophy of Nietzsche. Also, in some others views that argue against the emergence of a new humanism: Hermeneutic Phylosophy (Heidegger), Anthropological Structuralism (Lévi- Strauss), and post-structuralism (Foucalut, Derrida, Barthes). From this heritages, we develop an epistemologic analysis of the book “Humanism and Social Work”, written by Ezequiel Ander Egg. By putting into question some of the ideas in the book, we look forward to reflect about the effects of true and the implications for the professional practice of Social Work produced by the humanistic discourse. Thus, we recur to the bachelardian figure of epistemological obstacle, understood as the inquestionable knowledge that limits the possibilities of an other thinking for the profession. The hypothesis that we explore is that a naturalized and linear reading of Humanism, can turn it into an epistemological obstacle for the research and intervention in Social Work. |
|---|