State capacities for land-use planning: Proposal to strengthen the institutional political component

This article explores the State capabilities considered necessary to respond to social demands as well as to comply with regulations that run the process of land-use planning. It highlights the central role of the State in land management, a task deemed to be non-delegable. As a public policy and gi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papagno, Silvina, Vitale, Javier
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Instituto de Cartografía, Investigación y Formación para el Ordenamiento Territorial. CIFOT. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/proyeccion/article/view/4667
Aporte de:
Descripción
Sumario:This article explores the State capabilities considered necessary to respond to social demands as well as to comply with regulations that run the process of land-use planning. It highlights the central role of the State in land management, a task deemed to be non-delegable. As a public policy and given its multidimensional, prospective approach to complex processes, land-use planning (LUP) presents itself as a subject of study based on the analysis of specific State capabilities that enable the development and implementation of this policy.The mechanisms for design and implementation of public policies consistent with a post neoliberal state centralization, require to (re)consider state capacities related to LUP process. Its implementation remains as a shortfall among analyses. The aim of this article is to develop a proposal to strengthen the political component of this process.The article presents some definitions for state capacities. Afterwards, it provides an assessment tool and concludes presenting critical concepts such as those of “political project” and “leadership”. The work highlights the need of measuring capacities at the beginning of the LUP process, and the need for awareness-raising and strengthening both political capacities and anticipative measures