In praise of pathos in times of the push for depathologization.
Psychopathology studies the different forms of psychic suffering. Psychoanalysis subverted it byintroducing the hypothesis of the unconscious and disarming the health = normality Vs.disease=abnormality antinomy: psychism is always in conflict. The disease is not determined by adeficit functioning or...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Psicología. Cátedra de Psicopatología I
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pathos/article/view/27164 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Psychopathology studies the different forms of psychic suffering. Psychoanalysis subverted it byintroducing the hypothesis of the unconscious and disarming the health = normality Vs.disease=abnormality antinomy: psychism is always in conflict. The disease is not determined by adeficit functioning or by an inherited burden. Psychopathology thus became a psychopathology of dailylife: discomfort is essential for the condition of the human being in culture, which requires a limitation ofthe pulsion satisfaction in pursuit of life with others. The existence of the human being is itselfsymptomatic and cannot be conceived without some discomfort: the first duty is to find a way tosupport life. This article interrogates a transmission effect of psychopathology in the university thatleads to a certain reduction of clinical situations into the structural diagnosis of neurosis-psychosis. Itproposes to recover a diagnosis of pathos in a certain psychic or libidinal situation. |
|---|