Hegemony and accumulation: transformism and financial valorization of capital in Eduardo Basualdo's analysis
The specific forms assumed by the articulation between consensus and coercion within the development of the regime of accumulation by financial valorization in Argentina (1976-2001), is one of the central problems and questions that go through our recent history. Based on previous research advances,...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RIHALC/article/view/26477 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The specific forms assumed by the articulation between consensus and coercion within the development of the regime of accumulation by financial valorization in Argentina (1976-2001), is one of the central problems and questions that go through our recent history. Based on previous research advances, we will try to contribute to the still unfinished task of reconstructing in depth the evolution, occurred since the last civil-military dictatorship, of those devices oriented to the construction of consensus and hegemony. In general, and as in Eduardo Basualdo's interpretation –structured around the translation of the Gramscian concept of transformationism– the ideological dimension, and especially the role of intellectuals and experts - occupy a secondary place. However, as we will try to discuss in this work, the study of the devices (essentially discursive) constructed by neoliberal economists assumes a significant importance at the moment of understanding how financial valorization - essentially excluding accumulation regime in social terms - achieved social and political sustainability from the democratic period initiated in 1983. |
|---|