PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS OF WORK ENVIRONMENT IN URBAN AND RURAL AREA TEACHERS FROM CHUQUISACA, BOLIVIA

Abstract Objective: To compare psychosocial risk dimensions in urban area and rural area teachers from Chuquisaca, Bolivia. Method: A cross sectional study was carried out in 60 schools chosen at random (27 urban, 23 rural) in Chuquisaca; 1062 teachers were invited to participate (response 58%). To...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solis-Soto, Maria Teresa, Schön, Anabel, Parra, Manuel, Radon, Katja
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Escuela de Salud Pública y Ambiente. Fac. Cs. Médicas UNC 2017
Materias:
Psychosocial factors
teachers
urban
rural
Factores Psicosociales
Profesores
Urbano
Rural.
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/16791
Aporte de:
Revista de Salud Pública de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R360-article-16791
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-360
container_title_str Revista de Salud Pública
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Psychosocial factors
teachers
urban
rural
Factores Psicosociales
Profesores
Urbano
Rural.
spellingShingle Psychosocial factors
teachers
urban
rural
Factores Psicosociales
Profesores
Urbano
Rural.
Solis-Soto, Maria Teresa
Schön, Anabel
Parra, Manuel
Radon, Katja
PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS OF WORK ENVIRONMENT IN URBAN AND RURAL AREA TEACHERS FROM CHUQUISACA, BOLIVIA
topic_facet Psychosocial factors
teachers
urban
rural
Factores Psicosociales
Profesores
Urbano
Rural.
author Solis-Soto, Maria Teresa
Schön, Anabel
Parra, Manuel
Radon, Katja
author_facet Solis-Soto, Maria Teresa
Schön, Anabel
Parra, Manuel
Radon, Katja
author_sort Solis-Soto, Maria Teresa
title PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS OF WORK ENVIRONMENT IN URBAN AND RURAL AREA TEACHERS FROM CHUQUISACA, BOLIVIA
title_short PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS OF WORK ENVIRONMENT IN URBAN AND RURAL AREA TEACHERS FROM CHUQUISACA, BOLIVIA
title_full PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS OF WORK ENVIRONMENT IN URBAN AND RURAL AREA TEACHERS FROM CHUQUISACA, BOLIVIA
title_fullStr PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS OF WORK ENVIRONMENT IN URBAN AND RURAL AREA TEACHERS FROM CHUQUISACA, BOLIVIA
title_full_unstemmed PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS OF WORK ENVIRONMENT IN URBAN AND RURAL AREA TEACHERS FROM CHUQUISACA, BOLIVIA
title_sort psychosocial factors of work environment in urban and rural area teachers from chuquisaca, bolivia
description Abstract Objective: To compare psychosocial risk dimensions in urban area and rural area teachers from Chuquisaca, Bolivia. Method: A cross sectional study was carried out in 60 schools chosen at random (27 urban, 23 rural) in Chuquisaca; 1062 teachers were invited to participate (response 58%). To measure psychosocial risks, the short version of the questionnaire SUSESO-ISTAS21 was used, calculating odd ratios and its confidence interval of 95%, through models of logistic regression adjusted according to age, gender, higher academic degree and income. Results: Rural area teachers showed higher percentages of psychosocial risk compared to urban area ones, mainly in these dimensions: psychological demand (ORa 1.6; CI 95% 1.1-2.5), social support and leadership quality (2.9; 1.9-4.8) and doble presence (2.2; 1.5-3.4). Conclusions: Differences were found in psychosocial risks, unfavorable for rural area teachers, fact which could have an effect on mental and physical health.
publisher Escuela de Salud Pública y Ambiente. Fac. Cs. Médicas UNC
publishDate 2017
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/16791
work_keys_str_mv AT solissotomariateresa psychosocialfactorsofworkenvironmentinurbanandruralareateachersfromchuquisacabolivia
AT schonanabel psychosocialfactorsofworkenvironmentinurbanandruralareateachersfromchuquisacabolivia
AT parramanuel psychosocialfactorsofworkenvironmentinurbanandruralareateachersfromchuquisacabolivia
AT radonkatja psychosocialfactorsofworkenvironmentinurbanandruralareateachersfromchuquisacabolivia
AT solissotomariateresa factorespsicosocialesdelambientelaboralenprofesoresdeareasurbanasyruralesdechuquisacabolivia
AT schonanabel factorespsicosocialesdelambientelaboralenprofesoresdeareasurbanasyruralesdechuquisacabolivia
AT parramanuel factorespsicosocialesdelambientelaboralenprofesoresdeareasurbanasyruralesdechuquisacabolivia
AT radonkatja factorespsicosocialesdelambientelaboralenprofesoresdeareasurbanasyruralesdechuquisacabolivia
AT solissotomariateresa osfatorespsicossociaisdoambientedetrabalhodeprofessoresemareasurbanaseruraisdechuquisacabolivia
AT schonanabel osfatorespsicossociaisdoambientedetrabalhodeprofessoresemareasurbanaseruraisdechuquisacabolivia
AT parramanuel osfatorespsicossociaisdoambientedetrabalhodeprofessoresemareasurbanaseruraisdechuquisacabolivia
AT radonkatja osfatorespsicossociaisdoambientedetrabalhodeprofessoresemareasurbanaseruraisdechuquisacabolivia
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:26:23Z
last_indexed 2025-05-10T05:19:24Z
_version_ 1841584723440173056
spelling I10-R360-article-167912025-04-03T12:06:28Z PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS OF WORK ENVIRONMENT IN URBAN AND RURAL AREA TEACHERS FROM CHUQUISACA, BOLIVIA Factores psicosociales del ambiente laboral en profesores de áreas urbanas y rurales de Chuquisaca, Bolivia OS FATORES PSICOSSOCIAIS DO AMBIENTE DE TRABALHO DE PROFESSORES EM ÁREAS URBANAS E RURAIS DE CHUQUISACA, BOLIVIA Solis-Soto, Maria Teresa Schön, Anabel Parra, Manuel Radon, Katja Psychosocial factors teachers urban rural Factores Psicosociales Profesores Urbano Rural. Abstract Objective: To compare psychosocial risk dimensions in urban area and rural area teachers from Chuquisaca, Bolivia. Method: A cross sectional study was carried out in 60 schools chosen at random (27 urban, 23 rural) in Chuquisaca; 1062 teachers were invited to participate (response 58%). To measure psychosocial risks, the short version of the questionnaire SUSESO-ISTAS21 was used, calculating odd ratios and its confidence interval of 95%, through models of logistic regression adjusted according to age, gender, higher academic degree and income. Results: Rural area teachers showed higher percentages of psychosocial risk compared to urban area ones, mainly in these dimensions: psychological demand (ORa 1.6; CI 95% 1.1-2.5), social support and leadership quality (2.9; 1.9-4.8) and doble presence (2.2; 1.5-3.4). Conclusions: Differences were found in psychosocial risks, unfavorable for rural area teachers, fact which could have an effect on mental and physical health. Objetivo: Comparar las dimensiones de riesgo psicosocial en profesores de áreas urbanas y rurales de Chuquisaca, Bolivia. Método: Se realizó un estudio transversal en 60 escuelas seleccionadas al azar (27 urbanos, 33 rurales) de Chuquisaca, invitando a participar a 1.062 profesores (Respuesta 58%). Se utilizó la versión breve del cuestionario SUSESO-ISTAS21 para medir riesgos psicosociales, calculando odds ratios y su Intervalo de Confianza de 95% a través de modelos de regresión logística ajustados por edad, sexo, grado académico más alto e ingresos. Resultados: Los profesores de áreas rurales presentaron porcentajes más alto de riesgo psicosocial en comparación con los del área urbana, principalmente en las dimensiones: exigencias psicológicas (ORa 1,6; IC 95% 1,1-2,5), apoyo social y calidad del liderazgo (2,9; 1,9-4,8) y doble presencia (2,2; 1,5-3,4). Conclusiones: Se encontraron diferencias en riesgos psicosociales, de manera desfavorable en profesores de áreas rurales, lo que podría repercutir en la salud física y mental. Resumo Objetivo: Comparar as dimensões de risco psicossocial de professores em áreas urbanas e rurais de Chuquisaca, Bolívia. Método: Um estudo transversal foi realizado em 60 escolas selecionadas aleatoriamente (27 urbanas, 33 rurais) de Chuquisaca, convidando a participar a 1.062 professores (resposta de 58%). A versão curta do questionário SUSESO-ISTAS21 foi usada para medir os riscos psicossociais, calculando os ratios e seu Intervalo de Confiança de 95% por meio de modelos de regressão logística ajustados para idade, sexo, grau acadêmico mais alto e renda. Resultados: Os professores em áreas rurais apresentaram maior porcentagem de risco psicossocial em comparação com aqueles das áreas urbanas, principalmente nas dimensões: demandas psicológicas (ORa 1,6, IC 95% 1,1-2,5), apoio social e qualidade da liderança (2,9, 1,9 a 4,8) e a presença dupla (2,2; 1,5 a 3,4). Conclusões: Foram achadas diferenças de riscos psicossociais, desfavoravelmente em professores das áreas rurais, o que poderia afetar a saúde física e mental. Escuela de Salud Pública y Ambiente. Fac. Cs. Médicas UNC 2017-03-31 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/16791 10.31052/1853.1180.v0.n0.16791 Revista de Salud Pública; 2017: EDICIÓN ESPECIAL Factores Psicosociales del Trabajo y la Salud Mental; 17-27 1852-9429 1853-1180 10.31052/1853.1180.v0.n0 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/16791/16533 Derechos de autor 2017 Universidad Nacional de Córdoba https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Ejemplares similares