Remote presentation of thesis and final postgraduate works during the COVID-19 pandemic: are there advantages in the non-face-to-face presentations?
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic limited in person presentation of final works and theses for the completion of specializations, masters and doctorates. Objective: To describe the experience in remote presentations of summative essays and thesis. Materials and methods: A qualitative-qua...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/33144 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic limited in person presentation of final works and theses for the completion of specializations, masters and doctorates.
Objective: To describe the experience in remote presentations of summative essays and thesis.
Materials and methods: A qualitative-quantitative cross-sectional study was carried out. Perceptions of graduates and examiner board members were explored through a questionnaire.
Results: 54 presentations were included: 53.7% specializations, 40.7% masters and 5.6% doctorates. The average audience number was 34 and distance to the university was 273.6 km. 116 professionals answered: graduates 28.4% and examiner board members 71.6%. They were female gender in 51.5% and 36.1%, respectively. 100% of graduates and 96.3% of examiner board members believed that they were able to present the results of the investigation, and only 3% and 7.3%, respectively, reported technical difficulties. Positive aspects identified by graduates were higher comfort (45.5%), and greater audience number (36.4%); while the examiner board members identified preventing transportation (37,8%) and taking advantage of technologies (35,4%). Graduates identified as negative aspects audience invisibility (33.3%), and potential threat of technical difficulties (27.3%); whilst the examiner board members identified none (31,7%), and potential threat of technical difficulties (20,7%).
Conclusion: Remote presentations were successful for graduates and examiner board members, and allowed to continue and finish academic postgraduate training. |
|---|