People’s Politicity: Interpretation frameworks, territory and poverty
The aim of this article is to show the results of a research initiated in the year 2010 on politics and popular sectors in the city of Córdoba. In the last period, the analysis focuses on the strategies of two members of the base organization. These strategies were developed to meet their land, work...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Política, Sociedad e Intervención Social (IPSIS) de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales (FCS) de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC)
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ConCienciaSocial/article/view/23939 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The aim of this article is to show the results of a research initiated in the year 2010 on politics and popular sectors in the city of Córdoba. In the last period, the analysis focuses on the strategies of two members of the base organization. These strategies were developed to meet their land, work and housing needs.This research is descriptive with a qualitative approach and a non-experimental design. The process is defined as a case study that has as a spatial limit two territorial organizations in the neighborhood of Villa el Libertador in the city of Córdoba and as a time limit from 2007 to 2017. For the collection of information we have worked with : focus groups, life stories and in-depth interviews with members who occupy different positions within the organizations, who live in the settlement and / or work in the cooperative.We propose to present here the reflections that emphasizes the frameworks of interpretation of the popular sectors, around the networks of relationships and exchanges that they construct in their processes of daily reproduction in the territory. In this way, the contributions of the team allow the articulation of conceptual development that subscribe to a collective action processes.We decided to organize the article into three sections, first with a brief characterization of the theoretical work and the production context; Second, with a description of the areas that configure and synthesize the links and exchanges built around the resolution of the needs of people. Finally, we approach to the frameworks of interpretation that are constructed in these processes of reproduction, as approximations to the production and expression of popular politics in territorial spaces. |
|---|