Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism
This article is dedicated to the analysis of the idea of temporality embedded in Reinhart Koselleck’s Historik in light of the theoretical discussion around the interpretive but also political consequences born by different philosophies of history, more or less tacitly contained in proposals which...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/18809 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R10article-18809 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-10 |
| container_title_str |
Revistas de la UNC |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Historik Tiempo Teoría de la Historia Historik Time Theory of History |
| spellingShingle |
Historik Tiempo Teoría de la Historia Historik Time Theory of History Gay, María Eugenia Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| topic_facet |
Historik Tiempo Teoría de la Historia Historik Time Theory of History |
| author |
Gay, María Eugenia |
| author_facet |
Gay, María Eugenia |
| author_sort |
Gay, María Eugenia |
| title |
Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| title_short |
Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| title_full |
Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| title_fullStr |
Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Time in Historik. Essay of historiographical criticism |
| title_sort |
time in historik. essay of historiographical criticism |
| description |
This article is dedicated to the analysis of the idea of temporality embedded in Reinhart Koselleck’s Historik in light of the theoretical discussion around the interpretive but also political consequences born by different philosophies of history, more or less tacitly contained in proposals which present themselves as purely methodological and endorse the criteria of objectivity and the scientific nature of historical practice. With base on Koselleck’s theoretical texts and on his debate with two of his greatest teachers, Hans-Georg Gadamer and Martin Heidegger, we propose a reading of Historik’s philosophy of history and a reflexion on its advantages and disadvantages for the challenges of contemporary historiography. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/18809 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT gaymariaeugenia timeinhistorikessayofhistoriographicalcriticism AT gaymariaeugenia eltiempoenlahistorikensayodecriticahistoriografica |
| bdutipo_str |
Revistas |
| _version_ |
1764819781541691392 |