Bayesian conjugate analysis using a generalized inverted Wishart distribution accounts for differential uncertainty among the genetic parameters – an application to the maternal animal model
Consider the estimation of genetic (co)variance components from a maternal animal model (MAM) using a conjugated Bayesian approach. Usually, more uncertainty is expected a priori on the value of the maternal additive variance than on the value of the direct additive variance. However, it is not poss...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | |
Formato: | Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012munilla.pdf LINK AL EDITOR |
Aporte de: | Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí |
LEADER | 03068nab a22003017a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 20190513144038.0 | ||
003 | AR-BaUFA | ||
005 | 20220318104434.0 | ||
008 | 190513t2012 xxud||||o|||| 00| | eng d | ||
999 | |c 46318 |d 46318 | ||
999 | |d 46318 | ||
022 | |a 0931-2668 | ||
024 | |a 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00953.x | ||
040 | |a AR-BaUFA | ||
100 | 1 | |9 13019 |a Munilla Leguizamón, Sebastián |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Animal. Buenos Aires, Argentina. | |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Bayesian conjugate analysis using a generalized inverted Wishart distribution accounts for differential uncertainty among the genetic parameters – an application to the maternal animal model |
520 | |a Consider the estimation of genetic (co)variance components from a maternal animal model (MAM) using a conjugated Bayesian approach. Usually, more uncertainty is expected a priori on the value of the maternal additive variance than on the value of the direct additive variance. However, it is not possible to model such differential uncertainty when assuming an inverted Wishart (IW) distribution for the genetic covariance matrix. Instead, consider the use of a generalized inverted Wishart (GIW) distribution. The GIW is essentially an extension of the IW distribution with a larger set of distinct parameters. In this study, the GIW distribution in its full generality is introduced and theoretical results regarding its use as the prior distribution for the genetic covariance matrix of the MAM are derived. In particular, we prove that the conditional conjugacy property holds so that parameter estimation can be accomplished via the Gibbs sampler. A sampling algorithm is also sketched. Furthermore, we describe how to specify the hyperparameters to account for differential prior opinion on the (co)variance components. A recursive strategy to elicit these parameters is then presented and tested using field records and simulated data. The procedure returned accurate estimates and reduced standard errors when compared with non-informative prior settings while improving the convergence rates. In general, faster convergence was always observed when a stronger weight was placed on the prior distributions. However, analyses based on the IW distribution have also produced biased estimates when the prior means were set to over-dispersed values. | ||
653 | |a ELICITATION METHODS | ||
653 | |a GIBBS SAMPLER | ||
653 | |a PRIOR DISTRIBUTIONS | ||
653 | |a VARIANCE COMPONENTS ESTIMATION | ||
700 | 1 | |9 12817 |a Cantet, Rodolfo Juan Carlos |u Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Animal. Buenos Aires, Argentina. |u CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina. | |
773 | |t Journal of Animal Breeding Genetics |g vol.129, no.3 (2012), p.173–187, grafs., tbls. | ||
856 | |f 2012munilla |i en reservorio |q application/pdf |u http://ri.agro.uba.ar/files/intranet/articulo/2012munilla.pdf |x ARTI201904 | ||
856 | |z LINK AL EDITOR |u https://www.wiley.com | ||
942 | |c ARTICULO | ||
942 | |c ENLINEA | ||
976 | |a AAG |